slickmick

Nothings changed. He wheeled out his money man for the whole world to see. A man we were told at the time was the one and only money man. A man that would be well known to many. Since then the story has been stretched beyhond belief.

Daft thing is had Barclays waited until now most, if not all of the overdraft would have been repaid.

Announce to say the deal has collapsed or that they are still sorting out legal matters with the Football League. This is going to the final minute and it will be the Swiss imho.

:smt082 Best bit of news to come out of St Marys for a long time. £1m. Still can't get over that.

Your a Saints fan and your correct your judgment is appalling.

Very True. Why can't they disclose the fee ?

Your thoughts are shared by many.

Maybe now, but Strachan was his 1st choice.

Agreed.

Know one within the club, second hand information I'm afraid. But from someone I trust to be telling the truth. He has been right on previous occasions.

He was approached I am told and MLT'S 1st choice, but wanted to start on a level playing field.

Ask Strachan. My guess is as good as yours.

1st Choice would be Strachan, but less likely with -10. then Shearer but unlikely as he his divering with Newcastle. Next its between Keegan and Dowie. These are the ones I think MLT wants.

At the moment I would accept Ian Branfoot just knowing we will still be in existance. Still very uncertain about Pinnacle. Bet come Friday Pinnacle still haven't taken over.

Would have been Strachan had the 10 points been lifted. I am officially ITK on that one. Shearer was the next choice but he is still uncertain about his Newcastle role. Dowie also in the frame.

Thats because he can't afford a taxi.

And you can't even spell your name right. Apart from that, everything else you have stated has already been said on here.

I'm not impressed. Within 10 minutes of Fialka being known on here he has been exposed as a nobody. That should have been Fry's job.

Lynam and Fialka now both middle men. What a load b0loocks.

If there are other moneymen involved, why put this guy in front of the cameras ? Know one has heard of him despite Tonys claims he would be well known to some. If there is a bigger name still involved, then why hasn't Tony mentioned this ? Sorry Tony but you cant reveal your supposed money man to the media without expecting people to ask difficult questions about his substance. We have been told there is only one person involved that is well known in some circles, yet you seem aggitated when some question his wealth. If the digging and information that has been produced on here is incorrect then you can easily rectify that. To many inaccuracies have come from yourself which is what is causing concern.

My sentiments exactly.

I would like to know what GM has found out. Not sure what Tony Lynham meant when he said that some posters know him. Seems no one does.

Echo have been made to look right fools by this muppett. Serves then right for not contacting Peter Reid prior to their recent publications. Very poor,lazy journalism. Maybe they should get off their backsides to get a story, rather than get them from this forum.

Most have stuck theirs in the oven.