-
Posts
6,929 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Recent Profile Visitors
34,072 profile views
Saint86's Achievements
-
Hate to break it to you, but that will have been a fairly common appearance this season...
-
Hasn't played football in a year, so ofc he scores. Game changed from when Dibling came on and Sulemana went off, we lost all threat from the pace/power of Onuachu/sulemana. Palace have pushed up since then.
-
We absolutely should keep him next season. He's an absolute weapon and will only dominate more at championship level (against weaker players, less pace, and with less pressure on our passers and runners). For the small amount of money we'll get for him, he is an obvious player to keep.
-
Had a look through some of the numbers today and whilst the headline figure (£5.7M profit) sounds good on face value but there is a bit more to it than that. Brief summary of key points: Total wage spend last season was £70.7M, whilst turnover (with parachute payments) was £84.8M. So circa 83.3% turnover. Turnover itself dropped by £60.7M to £84.4M, which was largely due to tv monies, but within that we also dropped our commercial revenue by £5.5M (35% reduction) from £15.6M to £10.1M. Amortisations of players was £51.1M in the champ (down from £52M in the previous prem season). Given the extreme outlay in 2022/23, i suspect we'll see similar again when this year's books are released in a years time. High level figures then, turnover of £84.8M vs wages of 70.7M and player amortisations of £51M (actual total operating costs of £122.4M, a loss for the year of £35.9M if player trading revenue is excluded). Some good news (i guess) was that we paid down our loan by £23.8M bringing it to £69.6M - However this is still a significant sum. I would guess we'll have done similar this year so it probably stands at around £45M going into the champ next season? Looking ahead to next season then: Based on the above, assume turnover will be similar at around £84M. Assume player amortisation will be similar at around £50M. Assume wages will be similar at around £70M. Therefore excluding the loan repayments, we'll be looking to make a circa £35M transfer profit to balance the books... I don't know what the terms are on the loan, but potentially another £20-25M additional on top of that, so £60M transfer profit to balance the books. Then whatever money we want to spend on strengthening the team will also need to come from additional wage reductions/sales. Add on agents fees... Could all be utter horeshite, but thats my take on it all anyway 😇
-
That Koke fella brags about being the founder of the Bereton Diaz for Chile movement on X... Surely that would immediatley disqualify him? 😅😂
-
"Romain Gasmi on loan from RC Strasborg was once dubbed “the next Zidane”"😅
-
He's been there barely 2 months, had to settle in to a new country, culture, and style of football, and I believe he had a bit of injury trouble as well... But when he's scoring against Lyon at his age i'd say your view is pretty poor / out of whack on this one. It's really poor business by the club. Doubly so as there is absolutely no mention of a sell on clause! Also, why should we condemn and 17/18 year old as not good enough because they can't step up to the prem at their age and In this dross team? Also, our new sporting director has basically come out and criticised letting both SAA and meghoma go... But hey ho, maybe we should have hired Lighthouse as the new director of football, what does spors know after all? 😅😂
-
SAA now playing and scoring against Lyon... But ofc, not good enough for saints this season or next season, and absolutely not worth keeping hold off for just a little bit longer as his value increased.. 🤦
-
https://archive.ph/fugYs
-
Would love Ralph back as i'm sure he'd get us sorted, but sadly there is no chance he would ever come back. Reality is that he's a quality manger who is now onto a good thing in Germany. Also, why would he even come back? Our owners have been appalling since they came in, undermined him on the coaching and player front, and frankly much of our fanbase treated him pretty poorly as well over that final season. If we want Ralph back, then Rohl is likely as close as we'll get - but what is truly bizarre is that SR have already done a great job of getting rid of Ralph, his style, and utterly changing our general player profiles/types - only to be seemingly going back on it all with Rohl? 😂
-
For comparison, the Newcastle tickets were £8 for adults, £2 for concessions. Ours were £10 and £4. Both Newcastle and Sunderland are significantly bigger sides than Portsmouth (both in the mens' and womens' game), and there is certainly more of a feel good factor about football at both Sunderland and Newcastle than at saints right now. But yes, i agree, it does put the attendance figures for the "south coast derby" (as the club billed it) into perspective.
-
If we kept most of them, then the squad would be even better than last season's squad... who came 4th in what is widely regarded as one of the toughest championship seasons in recent years. We barely even saw the likes of ABK, sulemana, Onuachu etc., last season, so selling them wouldn't even impact on squad comparisons.
-
Anyone that doesn't understand Dibbling is a top top talent in the making really doesn't know much about football 😅. He started the season as an 18year old with no senior football under his belt - and he immediatley had some of the world's top defenders either scared to close him down or he was going around them for fun - Gvardiol didn't know what to do with him when we played Man City away ffs!! And he isn't just a speed player, he's about skill and power - neither are going to be leaving him for most of his career and in fact will only get better - he's already got great feet and can bully fully grown men physically at 18/19 - he carries the ball with ease, shows no fear at all, and is already contributing end product in what is quite literally one of the shittest top flight teams english football has ever seen. The kid is absolute class - I can't imagine what he'll be like once he's physically matured and has had a few more years learning how to use his bod. If we could somehow convince him to stay, sign a new deal, and have a new team built around him it would be the best business saints have done since they signed VVD. Its extremely unlikely sadly, but then a year playing week in week out and dominating the championship (which he certainly would bar injury) wouldn't be a bad thing for him - it did wonders for players like Lallana and Grealish. For certain players it lets them hone their own style and develop a lot of confidence which they can carry into the next stages of their career. And Grealish might also be a good example that moving to a big club isn't all its cracked up to be. Hope he stays, but if we sell him for less than £50M and a sell on clause it would be bad business.
- 781 replies
-
- 11
-
-
Pretty sure a Martin Saints team would have beaten that Wolves side (based on what i saw at least...)
-
Only managed to tune in once it was already 2-0, but that portion of the game seemed much better? Was the first 60min or so absolute gash i'm guessing? Wolves are a very poor side - probably the most likely team in the league to get relegated next season.