Seems to be a lot of doubt that our new acquisitions (Ramirez, Mayuka) can't play on the wing and if we played them, particularly Mayuka, anywhere other than in the middle then we'd have square pegs in round holes and would have wasted so much cash. Someone also recently lamented Chung being played 'out of position' at Stevenage, wasted on 'the wing'. But, looking at Arsenal tonight in the Champions League, their front three involved three out and out central strikers, two of whom (Gervinho, Podolski) kept taking wide positions then, with clever play, followed their runs into the box to be on the ends of movements they had started. I think it's dated to assume that we have to have 'wingers' - what's needed is clever forwards who take bright positions. I'm convinced that Nigel is thinking beyond something so rigid as 4-3-3 or 4-4-2. The fulcram is the midfield - protecting the defence, releasing the attack. Once the men in the middle get their heads around this role, it won't matter where our three forwards play - they'll all be swapping positions as the match goes on. However, eventually, I fear, Sir Rickie Lambert may simply not be able to keep up with such a system. Oh well, as Monsieur Wenger might opine, 'plus ca change.'