Sour Mash

Up the Saints

How many Islamic terror attacks across Europe would have to happen before you admitted there was a problem?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/04/07/donald-trump-right-swedens-crime-immigration-problems/

You don't have to go over the entire thread, there are plenty of examples demonstrated. But as you "Can't see how it can possibly be a bad thing" it doesn't seem like you're particularly interested in the subject anyway.

It's been explained numerous times on here how/why tv replays wouldn't work.

It's a great example of why video technology wouldn't work, just down to the different interpretations of the same event by different individuals.

I thought Soares was excellent, just lacks that final killer ball at times. Would love to see us have a run with VVD and Gabbiadini in this side.

Nothing to do with being "Super Exciting", just don't want the season to be over every time it looks like we'll be midtable in the Prem. There's a fair chance we'll have lots of similar seasons over the next few years.

As you can see from this thread he's got a weird obsession with Brexit and calling people he doesn't know 'pal'.

I don't get this attitude. We'll have loads of seasons where we don't win a cup and are midtable in March/April, will you always want them to just end?

Itchen North at it's best in that pic.

It's an example of why video refs wouldn't work.

First half we alright. Abysmal after the double sub early in 2nd half, embarrassing. Bournemouth fans must be gutted, will never get a better chance to win at St Marys. Good lively atmosphere in the Itchen North, shows it is a bigger game than just playing someone like West Brom.

Says who? Plenty of incidents take several reviews from different angles to find anything conclusive. What if another incident happens in the period the first decision is being reviewed?

I think you'll find you're not actually following it. So a simple scenario for you. What if possession doesn't pass back to the defending team and is retained for several minutes by those attacking? And in that period there requires another offside decision from the linesman. What does he do then, hold up two flags? And what if possession passes back to the defending team in a position much less favourable to them then where the offside decision would have been given? So they win back possession boxed in by the corner flag, rather than an offside just past the half way line?

:lol: I love this thread.

And if the originally attacking team instead successfully defend the break, counter-attack themselves and score, the game will get called back from an incident minutes before and everyone would stand around waiting to find out if the previous move had been offside or not. Farce.

How does that work?

Just read that back to yourself a couple of time. Any attack involving a move that might have an offside at some point and results in a goal fans, in your opinion, shouldn't "be overly excited". Its a game of football, not a scientific process to be full of checks and balances regardless of its impact on the game.

Agreed.

Its not complicated. The game could run for a couple of minutes, with the originally defending team breaking down the other end and scoring, all the while everyone in the ground with half an eye on the linesman with his flag up, then everyone stands around for a couple of minutes while the offiside is reviewed and the game is brought back a couple of minutes. Complete farce.

The key to goaline technology is it doesn't halt, delay or bring back play in anyway.

:lol: Top work lad.

What an absolute farce that would become.