mynameisthehulk

http://911research.wtc7.net/index.html Collision "At 8:46 Flight 11 collided with the North Tower. The NTSB places the crash time at 8:46:40. (There is no evidence for the assertions by some people, such as proponents of the bumble planes theory, that the North Tower was hit by something other than Flight 11.) Human remains recovered from Ground Zero were identified as belonging to Flight 11 victims" "At 9:03, Flight 175 collided with the South Tower. The NTSB places the crash time at 9:02:40. (Some people question the identity of the plane, as Flight 175, despite evidence such as the identification of human remains at Ground Zero as belonging to Flight 175 victims.)" "Few among even the skeptics of the official story doubt that Flights 11 and 175 struck the North and South Towers, despite the vigorously promoted theories that the towers were hit by something other than the jetliners. 4 New York City's chief medical examiner, Dr. Charles Hirsch, reported about a year after the attack that 33 victims from Flight 11 and 12 victims from Flight 175 had been identified. 5 Dr. Hirsch, who was himself injured in the attack, would appear to be a credible authority." ?

Why do you have to be so rude? I dont accept the official version of events but I am pretty sure I saw 2 passenger jets hitting WTC1 and WTC2, and am not a spastic who is going to say it was something else when I plainly saw 2 passenger jets. I also know there are a great deal of unanswered questions, foreknowledge is something of which I have no doubt, which in itself is reason enough for there to be questions over the whole official version of events as far as I am concerned. This author and book of yours, please could you tell me what are given as the explanations for the following. 1 - The pattern of wreckage from Flight 93 2 - The financial insider dealing prior to the attacks 3 - The post 911 removal of members of the Bin Laden family and other Arabs I am genuinely interested in these 3 topics, I hope this doesnt make me a obsessed, fantasist, idiot with pathetic paranoid delusions?

Can I ask you just a quick question? Do you 100% beleive that the official reports into the 9/11 attacks are entirely accurate? No, I do not beleive that the twin towers were blown up by GWB and the illuminati shape shifting lizzards in co-operation with Haliburton, Monsanto and Nestle, before you ask.

http://911research.wtc7.net/sept11/stockputs.html The put options prove foreknowledge as far as I am concerned, the rest is merely conjecture. Who had the foreknowledge, well it appears a bunch of finance types did, there must have been others surely?

The way people go on, to be honest I thought they performed fellatio on you while being superior in every way to everything else

Who is that black centreback? he is so dominant!

:smt041

any idea of the ca/pa?

I thought things made by Apple never went wrong?

I'll play the demo and find out for myself how the match engine is on CM. SI needed to leave the match engine where it was in FM07 and start working on the 3d in 08, they might have got it looking good by now and working smoothly, at which point the game should be made more immersive in terms of your character and other characters in the game.

My turn My first point to MLG would be that FM does not have a create a set piece facility to the extent that CM (from the video footage only) appears to have, so its impossible to compare what would happen in FM under the same scenario. My second would be that FM has been rubbish since 07, which was the best management sim ever IMO. 08's match engine was so full of bugs at release that it ruined the game for me, the press conferences annoyed me, added nothing followed by a plethora of offsides, long range wonder goals and about 7 injuries. Patched it was, but never felt as accurate as the previous match engine. For me FM09 was just FM08 with shyte 3d graphics, which in themselves caused problems for loads of users with lower end GPUs but did not add anything for those who could run it with no problems. I am going to give the CM10 demo a shot, and if its w@nk then so be it, but the FM series is flawed, going in the wrong direction and losing my support.

I think I can make 3rd place, which is pretty decent considering where I was after the 1st test...

Cracking signing this one, does things with the ball that no one else can, just like someone else we all know, different ball mind you.

Who cares!? his name is well cool

Kelvin is the best keeper in the league, anyone suggesting he is replaced has no clue.

It will be until they bring it out for the Wii

Trescothick Strauss Vaughan Ramprakash Key Prior Broad Swann Woakes Anderson Tremlett

Who is on the bench?

It was humid and cloudy on the third day, pretty damp too whereas it was a lot cooler and clearer on the final day. Anderson leads the attack, is a world class fielder and holds the record for most innings without a duck so how anyone could suggest he is left out at the moment I cannot understand. For me we are not going to bowl them out twice with only four frontline bowlers so if Flintoff can't play then its got to be Harmison. I would keep Broad in under those circumstances for his batting which along with Swann means that lower middle order has some chance of scoring more than a few handy runs. Broad needs to perhaps spend some time in county cricket to work on his bowling, but if Freddy is not fit we need him to add balance to the side.

Or that would have been easier, although your example displays Pompey when a1 is blank...

I created a table with the numbers 1-100 in column A and the values either Saints, Pompey or blank in column B. In the next worksheet I used a vlookup formula to return the correct value from the table when the number is input in a certain cell. It could be adapted for something more complex, depends what it is on how long it would take though... :supz:

I can do it, almost...the cell displays a #N/A error when when the cell is blank though. I am sure that what you need to do might be more complicated than the example you have given....

http://www.ebuyer.com/product/168750

http://direct.tesco.com/q/R.206-9216.aspx