That implies that you would prefer someone who is willing to chuck more money in than he gets back and someone who will be willing to run the club at a loss. Doesn't that just mean we would be back in the **** if they get run over by a bus? I think someone who is rich enough to get it back on its feet then run it as a viable business (possibly with some profit) is infinitely preferable, so if your assessment of Branson is correct he would be ideal.