kpturner

Yes it does. Maybe you need an upgrade

Corrected that for you

That sounds like an Americanism!

The latter would be nice, but I doubt we would find anyone who would part with £15m for him. Even we were not that daft were we? I'd be amazed if we to even break even on it by recouping the approx £12.8 we paid (give or take - allowing for the exchange rate differences).

Why is it that chants/songs by non-English clubs (especially Dutch, German, Turkish) all sound like they are coming from adult men with deep booming voices, whereas over here they all sound like prepubescent boys?

He has just posted the video but it doesn't mean he is there with him - but I guess you knew that already.

Although he turned out to be one of our better performers during that period of time.

That's gooderer

I know of one other, maybe even two. Who wants to sound like an American anyway - makes me want to throw up Have a nice day!

I guess not - I wasn't really paying attention.

A couple of "newbie" pointers: 1) Always check your thread title for silly typos before posting 2) Never use Americanisms (like "my bad") - unless you are an American (to be honest, I may be the only one who gets irritated by it) 3) Never use "loose" when you mean "lose" (not that you have - just sayin') I will post some more as I think of them.........or you can ignore me. The latter option is probably best.

I saw this thread as a less public way of coming out, in the hope that it would filter through surreptitiously.

It doesn't rhyme very well does it.

I used to wet the bed until the age of 7 - there, I've said it. It feels good to be out at last.

A man after my own heart!

ITN??

Getting over the odds for both Shaw and Lallana was good business by the Board IMHO. OK, I know that the term "over the odds" is moot - a matter for debate. I just happen to have a different view to many, but I am not alone by any means. Lovren is making a big fuss, to the point that it might be better for everyone if he was sold - but I still think if we get over £20m that will also be a good deal financially - just not necessarily for Koeman. Let's see how it pans out (Lovren that is).

Cant find it either then? Ok here goes.....but beware of the recursive loop: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=saints+wanted+%C2%A335m+for+lallana&l=1

It isn't hard - when you are looking for something that exists. I cannot find anything that tells me as a matter of fact that we wanted £35m for Lallana. As I already stated, top of the results list was this thread!. However, as you have already found it easily it will save time if you just post the link.

I've a feeling there are some dead cool, eye-opening facts in the OP somewhere.

Actually, I just googled "saints wanted £35m for lallana" and ended up back on this thread. I guess its true then.

Just post the link then - the one that says we wanted £35m for Lallana will do. I'll take a read and decide if I think its fact or fiction. If I am totally honest, I did read an aticle about wanting £40m for Shaw back in June but dismissed it as nonsense. Are you saying you think it was true? I am going to have to take more notice of these articles if that is the case.

Well, actually it is very hard to find, so I'll stick to regarding it as speculative nonsense rather than fact. Thanks anyway.

"It was reported....." Yeah OK. Thanks Genuine request: Let me see the the report that says we wanted £40m for Shaw. Let me see the report that shows the breakdown of the Lallana deal - or even one that said we wanted £35m. I want to judge the sources for myself before accepting it as fact. I haven't even seen the report that says that we want £25m for Lovren yet, but then I don't read the papers much.