TNT

They wanted answers to obvious questions on planning and finance. I suspect that will be detailed in the Daily Echo today. SISU where engagad as much as possible but our major shareholders where not going to succumb to a 'take it or leave it' written on a fag packet. Coventry where probably 24hrs away from admin in 2007 and we where not.

Well i have not even talked about 'survival' so i dont know why you mentioned that. The people running the Club at the time (executives) where a bunch of scumbags. They had bonuses lined up to push the deal through and couldnt give a toss about SFC. SFCs financial situation at the time was not good but it wasnt desperate to take such a ****e potless offer.

I said that Coventry where in a worse position than us at the time which made the offer to them very desperate to take. The major shareholders turned it down because of a lack of information. They wanted to know what would happen in say two years time financially. Is there any sort of 5 year plan etc. SISU would not answer any questions as detailed in a meeting held in a hotel in Runnymeade. Lets just see like i said what happens at Coventry in the next couple of years before making judgement on this Ranson offer.

I am not even convinced either that SISU where that interestedin SFC. They seemed to be in more dialogue with Coventry. Ray Ranson lives one hrs drive from Coventry which im sure played a part. In a couple of seasons it will be worth doing a check on Coventry and see what Ranson has put into the club to make promotion.

Well a figure of £40m looks good on paper but in reality they (SISU) where offering around £12m i think only as input. The major Shareholders wanted to know what else was going to happen. SISU refused to answer any questions on anything. So the major shareholders rightly in my eyes turned the weak offer down. Coventry at the time where in a far worse position than us and really looking at them hardly anyhthing of note has come from SISU.

Well i wonder if we will get to hear this alleged Lowe action of 'Never going to sell his shares or his chums to anyone connected with Wilde or the board.' That would of more or less stopped investment i imagine. Especially when Lowe then proxied the lot together and rocked the boat by giving the impression he was trying to sell to others. I believe i read elsewhere that a character called Marc Jackson was kingpin in these scare tactics that Lowe orchestrated after removal.

Daft idea and no way in a million years would he do the job anyway.

I think within the next 3 or 4 days as there is clearly no money to pay any bills.

Totally naive to give him that sort of money and merely showed he was a peanut manager working for peanuts ! Lowe then goes out and burns £500,000 on a rather joe average midfielder that wasnt needed.

I read it this morning on the way to work and can say i dont believe most of it. In fact i would go to say considering the coverage in the Echo they themselves are very much in the firing line with what they have printed in recent years. Jumping to the instructions of Lowe, Wilde and pr companies. The one interesting fact i could deduce from todays garbage was that Lowe wanted Gorman and Dodd to remain as caretaker managers until the end of last season ! I am extremely bored with reading this past stuff now and wish the Daily Echo would stop printing their so called exclusive stuff which can be taken with a pinch of salt like everything else.

So i was right then that 'two firm bids' (according to wotte) have been made and that this MLT stuff is an extra waiting to happen. Yes i would agree the Daily Echo would have blank pages if it wasnt for this forum !

Sounded like a total div when claiming the holding company wasnt anything to do with the club.

I was going for two offers made and this alleged MLT stuff being extra.

But i though Wotte said two offers made ?

Two firms offers made and neither are from this pinnnacle mob. In fact i cant see that going anywhere anyway. Does that sum it up ? I think it will be sorted within a number of days.

I was wondering if we have had this nineteens views on the £700,000 that Woodward walked off with ? We should of been saving money as soon as the club where relegated. Yet we paid that to someone who did nothing apart from arrange for some office furniture at staplewood.

Complete and utter garbage.

I cannot see the ability to vote for neither

I think that honour goes to nineteen canteen

Oh on just this season your right

Not really single-handedly as Lowe was on his case from day one. Still a judas for selling us all out. (proper saints fans that is)

If you digested the last Fry quote he talks about valuation and relegation. So i dare say thats where we are at with interested parties.

Why do i get the impression that certain people start these sort of posts for a reason and agenda ? Its so blatant that this is posted for a reason and so the usual rubbish from nineteen canteen can then pollute this forum. Tiresome and boring and very very sad.

I tell a lie apperently Crouch was a guest of Richards for the recent charlton match. But thats it. He has two exec boxs to sit in

Not seen either in the box since last year. Not sure either Mac or Crouch relegated SFC twice et all.