Verbal

You sure about that? Damn the Rothschild-funded MSM... No finished history of Farage can be written until all of the criminal and civil investigations, both here and in the US, are over. It's hard to believe that he will emerge unscathed, and among those with a modicum of honesty who've supported him I expect some mea culpas (don't worry, you're exempted, even though you disingenuously claim to have never voted UKIP). No one - unless you can persuade David Irving to write his official biography - will write approvingly of Farage, whose poisonous politics have infected those, like you, who have been susceptible to dog-whistle racist messages. I know how much it will have meant to you that Farage proudly unveiled that swamp-of-brown-faces ad on the day that Jo Cox was murdered. I know you'll have some pathetic excuse for why Farage repeatedly failed to win a parliamentary seat. And why his party lurches ever more towards making its vile racism explicit where he had tried to kept it under the carpet. Ashdown, on the other hand, did some good in the world. His four years in Bosnia alone will stand him in good stead among historians. But as a human being he's likely to be judged a thousand miles ahead of the little scumbag you've hitched your wagon to. Mazel tov, Al.

Not sure it's you who gets to decide. Besides, the degree to which your view of the world is pathologically warped is that you think Farage - a poundshop Oswald Mosley - is worth mentioning in the same breath as Ashdown.

Or to summarise: JIIIIIHHHHAAAAAAADDDDD!!!!!

He had a pretty distinguished career after going into politics too, with his four years as high representative in Bosnia. His achievements there, in the face of paralytic 'realism' from the international community, were exceptional. So we can comfortably ignore our two wizened kippers raging against the dying of the light.

So who is it this time that's led you up the garden path?

Could Jeremy Corbyn and Corbynist ultra, Fiona Onasanya, please hurry up and agree on which one of them is Jesus?

His true colours have been known about for some while - you only have to look at interviews where he is seriously challenged. He has a habit of losing his rag particularly on C4 News. His temper tantrums are all the result of an inability to process opposition to his worldview. He's also a manipulative and serial liar. Part of his 'defence' for his comment was that it was being blown up out of all proportion by the same media who simply ignored the death of a homeless man outside parliament. This was in fact a story reported by The Guardian, The Independent, The Daily Mirror, Huff Post, The Evening Standard, The Daily Mail and many others in the online and local media.

Following one of his half-witted calls with Erdogan, Trump is moving US troops away from large tracts of Kurdish-held territory. This leaves the Kurds open to attacks from Turkey and the Iran-backed regime. You obviously don't know that the Kurds WERE the ones placing themselves in harm's way, and doing a vast amount of the fighting against ISIS. You obviously also don't know what punishments ISIS meted out to captured Kurdish fighters. I suggest you google to find out, but you'll have to remove any parental controls to see the actual pictorial evidence.

That's twice this week that May - the worst Tory PM in modern history - has absolutely schooled Jezza, and both times as a result of his own dumbassery. If only Labour had a halfway competent leader.

Stupid people.

UJ, it's really simple. Apologise and then shut the fu ck up about it.

To take this further, the reality is that Brexit for Brexiters isn’t really about the EU at all (about which the majority of them cared not a jot until 2016). Witness all the witless blathering by Brexiters when they pretend to be remotely interested in trade policy. Mostly they just flatly contradict themselves – arguing, on the one hand, that WTO is some kind of free trade liberation against the plain reality that it is the world’s worst-case scenario of (sometimes massively) hiked tariffs and cross-border ‘friction’; and on the other, that being in the EU is some kind of restriction of free trade, when in reality it’s the largest free-trade bloc in the world. So Brexiters should give it up: they really are beyond crap at this trade malarkey, and it’s all a total chirade anyway. They can’t even name a single EU law they’d escape from that would make their lives better. Brexit is really about the destruction of an inclusive society, and that destruction is being vigorously pursued by angry, fearful, predominantly old, ‘English-born-and-bred’ whites. The Brexit slogan of ‘taking back control’ is little more than code for demands for white rights – ‘controlling our borders’ is all about slamming the door on immigrants of all kinds and threatening those that are already here. Some of these threats are official government policy – the forced impoverishment and deportation of old, Afro-Caribbean-born British citizens, the ‘Go Home’ vans sent by May into immigrant-populated neighbourhoods., and May’s derogatory labels for immigrants – citizens from nowhere and queue jumpers. And some of these threats have become, since 2016, increasingly a part of everyday life for many who have the sheer nerve to have a foreign accent or the wrong coloured skin. So we can debate about how many versions of Brexit there are, and, yes, there are really only two common types of the more bellicose Brexiter: racists, and enablers of racists.

Christ, this thread is turning into a constant fact-check for your blatantly false posts. The statement you quote relates to the 1,000 jobs at JLR lost in April this year. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/jun/11/jaguar-land-rover-to-move-production-of-discovery-from-uk-to-slovakia-jobs-solihull This is different from the announcement that JLR have just made about the additional loss of 5,000 jobs, which is explicitly Brexit-related. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/dec/16/jaguar-land-rover-to-axe-up-to-5000-jobs This is aside from the fact that ALL of Discovery production is being moved from the UK to the EU's Slovakia, and the I-Pace - JLR's outstanding electric car - being made in the EU's Austria. That yellow jacket should look nice with your black flag.

Another landmark day of celebration for al-Tenderi, JJ and other Brexit Jihadists - Land Rover are making 5,000 Brexit-related job cuts.

It's interesting to compare and contrast. The People's Vote campaign, which is largely run by young people - the ones whose future would be stolen by Brexit - managed to get more than 700,000 on the streets in support of their demands. The best the miserable Jihadists could do is have a dozen of them dress up in yellow hi-viz and block an ambulance trying to reach an emergency. A better demonstration of Jihadists' feebleness and breathtaking selfishness I couldn't imagine.

Any Jihadists fancy defending this scumbag behaviour? https://twitter.com/LeaveEUOfficial/status/1073558833878962176 This video of an ambulance being blocked by Brexit Jihadists - on a bridge, no less! - was proudly posted by Leave.EU.

That should be set reading for Brexit fantasists everywhere. However, Rogers is dealing purely in facts, so Brexiters have the usual get-out when reading something that ruins their (what's laughingly called) worldview: to insist on living in an alternate universe where facts don't matter. Among many stand-outs is this bit: This is a beautifully effective demolition of the sheer, mad fantasy of greater 'sovereignty' - a concept that no Brexiter I've ever heard has understood. The point is though - in the pursuit of 'sovereignty, Brexiters will have badly weakened the UK sovereignty, whether it's under May's deal, no deal, Norway+, Canada+ (there is no +++), or any variant of Brexit whatever. So when Brexiteers whine about being described as stupid, you can take it as read that they are themselves giving proof of their own stupidity, without any help from remoaners at all.

No one in the EU will understand it because it's dual language - English and horsesh it.

You're like a speak-my-extremism parody. Your support for ERG, allied with your (in your mind) genteel racism and your creepily expressed hunt for traitors, puts you in a tiny minority of far-right ignoramuses. May voted remain but she is fundamentally in tune with the core Brexit constituency, who thought the same as her that the real evil was those damned immigrants. As Home Sec she resorted to vicious actions - like the Go Home wagon and ramping up 'hostile environments' - to victimise, among others, ageing British citizens born in the Caribbean, ruining their lives and evidently delighting you. And to address a couple of earlier points: 1. Neither Brexiters nor remainers resort to violent language - but Brexit jihadists do. You do. As does your bestie JJ. And 2. Re: your 'dislike' of 'the Arabs' (fu ck me, what an utterly cretinous comment), why do you 'dislike' any of the following Arabs: Yazidis, Kurds, Ismailis, Ahmadis, Druze, Zoroastrians, Copts, Lebanese Christians, Iraqi Marsh Arabs, Christian Palestinians, any Palestinians, Bedouin Arabs, Israeli Arabs, Bahraini Shia, Southern Iraqi Shia, Syriac Christians, Assyrians, etc., etc. These, and many more, are encompassed within your 'the Arabs'. So give us a good, heartwarming, Brexity explanation for your racist feelings against Arabs. And confirmation that you've ever knowingly met a single one of them. Ta very much!

Try stepping away from your cold Jihadi fury for a moment and consider my post as just a piece of political guesswork based on the fact that there's no majority in Parlaiment for ANY Brexit outcome. Are you able to do that? Where do you see a parliamentary majority? Besides, the issues of who replaces May presupposes that she'll lose the vote tonight. I don't think she will. Are you capable of responding to that as a political outcome too, rather than raging into the twilight?

Given the febrile state of Tory party office politics, I'd say Gove. Not that it'll change anything. The simple fact is that there is not a majority for ANY Brexit outcomes (no deal May deal, Norway+, no Brexit) within the HoC, and whoever the new leader is won't alter that equation. A remoan victory in a people's vote the only possible way out, because a leave vote will simple condemn the country to another A50 cycle and we all play political Groundhog Day again.

Oh look, another Jihadi finding things to do with piano wire. https://twitter.com/jk_rowling/status/1072495799265824768 What is it with 'winners' like JJ and al-Tenderi - and this idiot - that leads them to such violent, vengeful imagery?

Got any evidence for your little conspiracy theories? The reality is that the ECJ ruling, in the face of opposition from the Commission, was a decision in favour of UK sovereignty. I thought you were in favour of that! Also, I'm intrigued to know how democracy is denied by voting. But if you want a real sense of who is contributing to the un-democracy of Brexit, take note of the Brexit-financing and backing hedge funds who are shorting post-Brexit Britain and are set to make vast fortunes from unemployment and economic damage. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/dec/10/hedge-funds-make-big-bets-against-post-brexit-uk-economy

Remoaners get your voting skates on. The ECJ has ruled that Britain can withdraw the Article 50 notice unilaterally. Which makes a vote on any 'deal' vs remain even more likely.

Genuine question - is your tele on the blink?