capitalsaint

Not irrelevant, the Sunday Times focus is on the U.K. so they only include the top 50 in the world. Being that you need £7.8bn to get onto that, he isn't included.

send that to the papers! let's capitalize on this negative exposure.

Nor does capitalsaint! I don't enjoy the politics of this board, but hasn't the OP gone a bit mental?

I'm confused, who wants pardew out?

Fantastic appointment, always had time for the man.

Having seen some pics, it was def shelvey and springs tucking into mcdonald's. Shows how much they care!

I'm sat in mcdonalds on the a20 and 4 lads wearing immaculate, matching training gear have just started tucking into some grub. I think we'll be ok! I'll find out who they are later, one is totally bald with a huge nose, another is going grey and has tats on his arms.

http://www.taxinnovations.com Highly recommended.

yes, but you miss the point. you cheated because you took on players that you couldn't afford, ie couldn't physically pay the tax on their wages. we do pay the tax, and the wages. we aren't cheating because we haven't failed to pay anybody. for what it's worth i respect you for trying to come on here and stick up for your club, it's just a shame you let emotion cloud logic. don't you think?

i've noticed the blue few talking about an interview given by (their) RL on The Quay. Anybody know where I can find it?

not being personal, but that doesn't really work for a football club. not settling for second best is fine in your own life, it pushes you to improve yourself, but if you can't directly change or affect a situation, not settling for second best with a team you support is pretty futile. you don't speak to the players, so getting angry with a manager's performance will do nothing to improve our standing. surely as a successful person you must see the difference? football is a game, as someone who has enjoyed success in their life it must ultimately fall pretty low on your list of priorities, because it doesn't really make much difference to the world.

totally agree, some of their arguments are laughable.

Possibly one of the funniest posts I've ever read! I think you should maybe have another read of your Descartes, perhaps something got lost in translation?

what have i missed?

+1!

i can see the skates stealing this, like typical jammy gits.

isn't there a rl shaped space next to claus?

delayed? wtf?

it's started, they'll get 28 days at worst. jammy gits.

just like to repeat, this is the greatest thread ever to exist.

meant wow for that design, not the comment!

wow!

I just don't understand the argument that the info was already in the public domain. The Echo could quite easily have just said 'in tomorrow's edition, exclusive information about Southampton's new training development' etc, showing that they were aware of the story and will give its readers a fat load of juicy information the next day. Then they'd have had exclusive quotes from NC and all would have been well. Just because the info was in the public domain doesn't mean they had to print it that second, plenty of media organizations ration the release of information, irrespective of their rivals. Just look at SSN! I don't see how the Echo would have been disadvantaged as we'd have still bought it in order to get all the inside info about the project, whether it had a pathetic 50 words in a red-top or not.

"I'm really worried that everything seems to be going well at the club and that the owners are doing things that the fans want blah blah etc..."

+1. A dream scenario IMO.