brmbrm

How about another forum for *****-fighting? Sort it out you girls.

I think he is calling you a nob. HTH On another note, i think half or so of the posters above actually prefer it when we lose: chance for a good moan, kick the cat, slap the mis... oh

"must" = "essential" Saints: played 30 Charlton: played 30 Says it all really.

You're a fine one to talk, Victor.

OK, I wasn't there. Please tell me what you were singing. Please don't let it be what i think it is.

Are we there yet?

Are we there yet? .

Are we there yet?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/eng_div_2/9394815.stm waterloggerd pitch

Listen to the audio and he doesn't really emphasise this like in the short written extract. So I don't think he was deliberatly trying to give oblique criticism - he could be a lot more forthright. But if it happens agaoin he bloody wll should do and make it perfecetly clear.

A bit of a less superficial view would be that it is a move towards healing rifts, a more political gesture aimed at trying to bring the parties together, quite probably with condescension from the PLC. I am not against that by any means at all, just maybe it is a bit more realistic/less malleable than people who believe everything they read in the Echo (???ugh?? does anyone????)

FFS the fact that he made so few mistakes was why he was playing at "the top level of the game". And he was top internationally, not just the prem the Champioship or League 1. Thank God we have a manager who is better placed and better able at making these sorts of decisions than web forum posters. (There was an experimetn of fans vote for who goes on the team sheet (can't remember which club) - what a laugh!)

Wow! A namelike "Stig Johansen" and you thiought he was berlack? You must have had an almost as a retentive upbringing as me then! (Is that a sentence?)

Well, I have been supporting Saints for the best part of 50 years. I never thought I would hear this sort of comment from a Saints "fan". In 5, 10, 20 years, Cortese, Lowe etc will be gone and forgotten. Matt won't. And maybe by the SFC PLC will support charity events again.

What a ***. I have been to stadiums for varoius sports in many countries, enjoyed a beer while watching, even in UK in concerts etc et you canb drink a beer, but not watching footy. Just because of knobs like this @r$ole. Spoils it for everyone. Lol out loud: "...only stopping after appearing to hurt his foot..." Brain dead moron. Better out than in.

This

Good words, but wish they could be transcribed into grammatical English, or maybe he was on the juice at the time, which would explain it. Second thought: can we ban the posting of "This". Or at least award the "This" posters a nob award, with the nob-of-the-week (i.e. most "This"-es getting a golden nob award. They just waste people's bandwidth.

Good point, good point. My mong.

Errr, maybe we will beat them when we play them?

You really can't have that at all. If there is any lack of "independcen" in these sorts of organisaitons the big boys would be all over and they would be chucked out. They are only there because of their impartiality. You have zero evidence for what you are saying, but I guess you let your prejudice get in the way of it. (And, yes, i speak from some experiencce here)

A big deal? I don't really think so, but it does show the club up in a pretty ****** poor light. And the IFO report independnently says exactly that.

How about some polls: Do you like NI? Yes/no/don't know Should we (i.e. SFC) ban gingers? Yes/no/don't know Should we (i.e. SFC) ban women? Yes/don't know/women go to the footy????? etc etc

That doesn't hold - hell he has form for petty, childish behaviour: photographer ban, statements to the media/SFC web site about FA cup ticket prices (against Cheltenham? Shrewsbury? Can't remember)

I take it you're banned then. Fair enough.

Unfortunately that doesn't mean "no fan will be banned for no good reason" (or fair reason or legally valid reason or whatever).