sotonist

so friday then.

£1000 - £999 is a seven figure sum.

Who was it that said it was someone smalltime backed by a hedge fund? This looks consistent with that.

That site has been publishing bull**** since day one of the pinnacle bid. I hadn't linked it with MJ, though that might be an astute observation. I just thought they were trying to build up their readership by publishing as many articles about any old crap as they could while interest is high in general.

Not surprised. Nakheel are potless.

In the case of planning permission the buyer could have applied for planning permission on the property in question and gotten a definitive answer.

I don't think there's any reason to liken them to Wilde. Pinnacle don't need fan support to take control of the club.

I don't know what the purpose of your compaison was, but NewCo doesn't want to acquire the assets of SFC. it is acquiring SFC. There is no new member. The original member will change hands. As far as getting our points back via a means of redress i'm sure you're right, but as football is a business and there is money involved there has to be scope for compensation as with sheffield united/west ham. The FL could get awkward again and take their ball home with them but i'd be so sorely tempted to make them try. In fact if Pinnacle weren't so determined to buy the club and no buyer could be found before it went under I'd be tempted to buy SFC limited with no footballing business only to try and sue the football league for what it had done.

I reckon it'll be Bez

Has no basis in fact and will not hold water under any examination.

well that doesn't fit the description at all. are you saying TL is telling porkies?

Well I'm glad a TV guy is so confident. That's good enough for me. I'm convinced.

Kachloul grabbing Lee Bowyer by the neck in 2000? Anyone remember that? I've tried a number of times over the years to find written evidence that it happened but failed.

At least if he joins us it will signal that the funds are there to match his ambition, judging by his words to the press.

No, that's what they really look like. I saw them on the day. It was terrifying.

I don't thing dyslexia minks you spill the wrong worms correctly.

He scored his first six goals in the first 26 matches and his second six in the remaining 20. It's a difference but it's not really substantial. I'll admit there were a couple of matches in which he was our best player in the second half of the season but the rest of the time he was most people's pick for the first substitution. Put together his underwhelming performance with his misadventure off the field, his desire to return to nottingham and probable lack of desire to drop a level, I think we'll get more commitment and better value out of trying to pick up the next lambert/cox/beckford.

By the same token, he can improve, but will he? I'd rather sign two or three non-leaguers like beckford with a fraction of the transfer fee and salary and give them a go rather than hold on to a player wo wants to leave, whose contract will be diminishing and his reputation may be going with it.

McGoldrick scored 12 league goals by playing in every single game and playing almost every minute of every single game. It wasn't an impressive scoring feat really. How many of the top scorers in league one last season cost their clubs £1m+? I'm confident we can replace him.

It was posted in the "Pinnacle clinches it" thread. I think the OP just wanted to draw attention to it and give people a place to discuss the message itself without distractions.

I wonder if a certain guest at their final fixture might not have been acting as a consultant/agent in these matters.

The badge is appalling. The shirts are OK.

and our corner kicks straight into touch.

Jonathan Ross?

if reading affects your breathing it's probably your problem.