sotonist

AL hasn't had a bath since he left.

I don't see fox as an athlete either He makes a blistering run once in a blue moon but immediately reverts back to hobbling about like an old man. He's got a good cross on him and he's a decent height. That's where his virtues end. Celtic sold him to premier league Burnley. Hooiveld was sent on loan to the championship. Not exactly like for like. Fox is the least capable of the two though.

Paying up contracts doesn't sit right with me. It's only fair that we pay him until he gets another gig, but we shouldn't subsidise his next employment. As long as we're not obstructing his freedom to get another job.

normal service resumed then. don't think it would have been any better under adkins. signings just haven't been good enough, players that were liabilities last season are still hanging about.

maybe he can afford some cable management now. seriously.

Yeah it's a gap in the laws. Unless a referee sends Svensson off, the goal opportunity is denied. As I was saying a penalty would be justifiable by common sense. Ball deflected by a part of the player that couldn't legally strike the ball. In Fox's case the deflection only denied a cross into the box. Penalty? Not for me.

79 not very good really. Bad misses included Surman, Baird, Higginbotham, Chaplow (i really should have started with the squad we've got right now), Davis, Viafara (couldn't remember his name without looking), and Delap.

Because referees. Because Mike Dean in particular. Also because Tottenham not winning against Southampton at WHL. http://www.southampton-mad.co.uk/news/tmnw/saints_to_appeal_svensson_dismissal_60713/index.shtml Maybe you could explain to me why it would be a booking and a penalty if not deliberate? Looking at the rest of the laws supplied by the same source, I find a penalty kick is awarded when any of the 10 fouls for which a direct free kick would be awarded is committed within the penalty area. Deliberately handling the ball is one of the 10 fouls for which a direct free kick can be awarded. No deliberate hand ball, no foul, no card, no penalty. Am I missing something?

No he was definitely sent off.

Penalty probably justified in that case mind. just not the card. In Foxes case, indirect free kick?

Michael Svensson stanging on the goal line, the ball fired at the goal, hits his hand hanging naturally by his side, penalty, red card. Genius.

Considering AL's shooting... about the same.

lol, you'd thinkg everyone would have been familiar with that quirk. It had me ****ting myself when were were -10.

To be fair, he only needs to have spoken to 50%+1 of our fans. But as the answer is yes, I must have had my mind erased because I haven't spoken to a dalek for about twenty years.

I'll remember this for the next time I'm the chairman of a premier league football club.

Congratulations on your escape.

They fixed it for the repeat

ANd of course you can't apply it retrospectively, but you could phase it in by allowing only x players in a matchday squad to break the rule.

Don't force the player then. Just make players contracted outside the rule ineligible to play.

Yep that's going to stop clubs falling to little pieces after getting relegated and losing the biggest revenue stream. Should have just ruled on player contracts mandating that they be heavily cut on relegation. Dont' allow any QPRs offering guaranteed money.

I think we should sign Noone.

Fixed.

Josie Fonter.

I nearly posted the same immediately to answer my own question.

Any chance we got a good deal for setting the precedent ahead of any verdict?