sotonist

out of interest is the kid whow got a chocolate cake instead of a watch in it?

we can cover all bases by writing "nearly" on it in permanent marker if anyone signs. but leave room to fit "not" in front of it for the long term.

all the saints published November 29th 2013 inaccurate by the end of january.

if he is, he's been lifting a lot of his material from Dae Kitson interviews.

who runs bartertown?

he has a ghostwriter

Fox was a much better attacking threat in the championship. He wasn't a much better defender.

are they allowed to print a copyrighted image on your card though?

we'll be top of the training league. unless other teams do better in training than we do.

well it's obvious isn't it. we weren't going to subsidise him following his old manager. this explains everything satisfactorily IMO.

I reckon victor chandler might be... the bird in his tv adverts is a tad suspicious.

What colour laces do we wear for the pro-homophobe campaign. I can't think of a single currently active footballer who has come out as a homophobe. A study performed in 2007 in the UK for the charity Stonewall reports that up to 90 percent of the population support anti-discrimination laws protecting gay and lesbian people. This means that ten percent of footballers are homophobes but are afraid of speaking up and being their true selves.

That's assuming it's appropriate to victimise people for thinking homosexuality is wrong.

I would have thought the only people the chant would offend are homophobes. Let's all accuse eachother of homosexually until the homophobes can't stand it any more and GTFO.

chun lee, is it? she's let herself go a bit since street fighter.

Yeah it's a marginal decision. He's earning double wages by sitting on his arse for the remaining two years of his contract. If he moved on his earning prospects might rise with inflation and he might get a couple more years out of his career, giving him a net benefit, but those are ifs. The contract he's got is absolute.

tell your autocorrect it's horde.

in the first case probably didn't like the elbow. second time just a nasty piece of work... but it would be hilarious if a male footballer got pulled down by his silly hair like that.

it's got to be a point of principle rather than a business decision tbh. as you say, the club would gain more by having our costs reduced by whatever wages he's worth. instead the chairman obviously feels that the player should consider that if he's not worth those wages to any other party, he can watch his career and earning potential atrophy while picking up his inflated salary. So far I don't know if anyone has blinked over this. Dickson seemed to ride it out.

Didn't he get voted our player of the season and bought by stoke?

if they all spend half the game adjusting their pony tails he'll probably lose his ****.

We completely coincidentally signed a third choice keeper from Tottenham at the same time as accepting their advanced settlement for the Bale transfer. Sounds legit.

Glad MP has modified his position from saying he was happy with the squad.

we did well to come back to 1-0 from 2-0 down tbh.

I'm lost... where in the story would £2000 stop the stalker?