scotty

:lol:

This x 100. I'd rather keep MP than let keane in through the door.

Something good has come out of the weekend protests at West Ham, in the form of a major new sponsor. "We heard about the bottled piss and went for it," said a Fosters spokesman.

Setting myself up for a fall here, but imho they're now in too deep to sack him before the season ends. He won't be sacked until then.

"for the man who doesn't have to try......."

I know. I'm trying to come up with a plausible theory as to why Pellegrino is still our manager, as I've yet to hear one. The only single thing I can see is the board thinking "he cannot possibly get any worse and we are still outside the relegation zone". Nothing else that's been suggested makes sense to me.

The only thing I can think is that of the sides who've changed managers, unless stoke beat citeh three of them are still, somehow, below us. Perhaps the board are clinging to that.

I'd suspect Harvey Keitel, but he's too busy flogging car insurance.

No. We've sunk so low that even Harry Kane is trolling us.

Whereas Murphy last week said that both saints and stoke ought to be ok.

What a load of prats you lot are going to seem when MP wins our next three, finishes mid table, wins the FA Cup and proceeds to challenge for a champions league spot next season. F*cking hell, this cough syrup is brilliant stuff.

And here was I thinking that any club with David Sullivan in charge would simply ooze class.

I've just checked in. So to summarise, it's going pretty well then?

...and yes, I was fully aware of the satirical nature of the piece.

You infer a great deal about what I know and what I don't. The point I was making is that practically every argument put forward on this thread in favour of staying is basically referring to the financial consequences of leaving. Those voting to leave didn't do so on financial grounds in the main, although a few may have believed the twaddle peddled by the hard line leavers.

There's an excellent point lurking there. If that generation hadn't been so pathetically self serving we could have not bothered with WW2; think how much better off we'd all be now, German efficiency throughout our manufacturing sector, a generation of wealth creating young men wouldn't have got killed in our fit of pique, europe would be united under a single flag, and financially everyone would be in gravy. And people in their seventies have the brass neck to call Churchill a hero.

Why oh why couldn't she have sold to a good old fashioned British criminal. Answer me that.

:lol:

I hope you're right, but at this stage it's genuinely difficult to imagine that happening.

Nobody has suggested that the Italians would vote to withdraw from the EU.

That's not the only bizarre thing.... How did I not see that coming? A sample of a handful of relatives - case closed! That obviously trumps opinion polls in BrexitWorld. ....at the same time he seems to be saying that the opinion poll statistics he's putting forward as gospel trump the actual outcome of a real general election. :lol:

I didn't mention your quoted statistics. I was replying to Shurlocks comments about Italy not being anti-eu but anti-establishment by saying that some relatives and the typically large social groups they tend to gather in routinely express strongly anti-eu views. As for the euro, which is one of its main bedrocks, even the most ardent eu supporter couldn't claim that it hasn't caused massive resentment between northern and southern Italy. It is simply inaccurate to portray the country as pro-eu, and the election results reflect that.

:thumbup:

My wife is Italian, and most of her family over there are vehemently anti-eu mainly over immigration. I also hear a hell of a lot from them about the euro, that's a pretty sensitive point with them too.

It must have been short if it came as a shock to the club. RIP.