benjii

Yes!!!!!! Couldn't place it.

Welllll

For some reason, these references to "Let's bring in Lord Pannick" makes me think of "Shall I fetch Kenneth?". It's like a leg of lamb!!!

The UK Defence Attache to the UAE js called Sandy Sandilands. Fact.

Perhaps. Either way, we shouldn't be giving a 30 year old with no prior management experience free-reign.

Ramsey isn't dead.

Does he need to be omnipresent to know there's loads of chatter throughout the analysis team about spying? That seems like a cop out.

Probably Boro.

Isn't it his job to have oversight, though? Seems like, if it isn't, there is a real organisational gap somewhere.

"we will also be writing to the EFL to volunteer our participation in a working group on the practical application and enforcement of Regulation 127 across the Championship" A.k.a. this is rife, so watch it.

Literally a criminal offence!

That doesn't sound right!

In theory, I don't see why not, but there is a large risk. You can be forced to give an undertaking that you will compensate the enjoined party if it turns out the injunction was wrongly granted. So let's say we get the final called off, and it never gets played because time runs out, but it turns out the injunction was not justified, we would be on the hook to the EFL for a lot of money. So it would be high risk and also likely make the club very hated!

This means we can spy on Hull until 4.30 today, but Boro can only do it until 3.30. Advantage Saints.

I'm not sure if they gave the evidence. Think the whistleblower may have jad evidence for those matches?