benjii

Woke nonsense!

Are there seriously swathes of white people who think they would rather be treated by institutions as if they were black / brown? Careful what you wish for.

Come friendly bombs and fall on Lowe.

This patriot makes an excellent and nuanced point. https://x.com/i/status/2061924489575743837

Once more unto the wheelie-bins, dear friends, once more; Or close the wall up with our English dead. In peace there's nothing so becomes a man As Lonsdale shoes and a can of Stella: But when the blast of war blows in our ears, Then imitate the action of the Tiny Tommy; Stiffen the sinews, summon up the coke, Disguise fair nature with hard-favour'd terrible tattoos; Then lend the eye a terrible aspect; Let pry through the haze of vape Like the GB News; let the brow o'erwhelm it

I think so. Hemp-shoed weirdos.

There are plenty of things for people to be annoyed about but most of those have far deeper roots than the latest Labour government. That's not to say they have done a great job, necessarily, but the hate towards Starmer is just reflective of people swallowing absolute shite on Twitter and GB News etc.

I assume we would put him somewhere else in the group and bring him back after?

The killer is in prison, and I think three members of his family have been arrested?

You think Farage and Lowe give a shiny shit about the working class?

They are sad as fuck.

Police get paid peanuts and aren't properly resourced so it's no surprise when they turn out to be inept. Like any large organisation there are good ones and bad ones, but if you starve it, it will degenerate over time. Aside from the police response, which was obviously atrocious, this feels like a very British story to me. Two lads out late at night. Some sort of scrap. One gets killed. Perhaps Digwa was too acclimatised. If he had been a bit more Sikh this might not have happened.

Reading the appeal, a couple of things stand out. I) The May 8th statement was disastrous. Which fuckwit signed off on that? Why so eager to send something without the facts? Just object in the strongest terms to the timeline and say we need longer to deal with it. 2) Sounds like we volunteered the Oxford and Ipswich evidence? Surely not. It's still unclear who exactly said what and what evidence was provided. 3) It seems pretty clear we weren't aggressive enough in the initial hearing, and just assumed expulsion wouldn't happen. 4) No mention anywhere of raising the impartiality of the panel members. Why not?

I wonder if Winnie declared his prior employment to the panel. I've asked his firm three times but they seem unwilling to reply.