hutch

But the prognosis must be that it would be better to build new post-Brexit arrangements, piece by piece, going forward from a basis where none exist, than trying to reverse out of bad arrangements weighted heavily in favour of the EU.

As the great man said, It ain't much I'm asking, I heard him say, Gotta find me a future move out of my way, I want it all, I want it all, I want it all, and I want it now, I want it all, I want it all, I want it all, and I want it now. It'll take 20 years++ to unwind our position, but so what. Things will be different. Different isn't necessarily worse. Or better. Some will gain and some will lose. Just a small issue I read yesterday about the M20 becoming a lorry park if we have hard customs borders at Dover and Folkestone. You don't think that if hauling by truck becomes a problem the smarter operators will shift to containers? Would anybody argue that fewer Bulgarian truck drivers on the M1 is a bad thing?

Fantastic plucky point at home against United. Looks like the treble is back on again.

Nautical or statute?

Nicely done. Have you been taking lessons, or just practising on your own?

Wait til you get older and you'll find out

Be sure to look at "Factortame" while you do, if you want to get to the bottom of the fishing issue, and at the same time get an indication of why the jurisdiction of the CJEU is such an important issue.

It's a pretty standard assignment of proceeds as security for a bank facility. It would only be exercised if SFC were to default on any payments due to the bank holding the assignment.

To be fair, who could resist the huge 7-pointer when 23rd v 15th in the 3rd division meet head-to-head?

Tell you what, pal. (We're all pals on here aren't we?) I'll put my hands up and agree I'm a tit if you can show: a) that the 300% tariff is a result of Brexit; and b) the tariff levied on wing components arriving in Canada from Belfast is 300%

That is exactly my point. There is no link between the Bombardier tariff and Brexit. The tariff would still be 300% even if we had voted to remain in the EU.

I was responding to a post on a thread with the title Post EU - The Way Forward where badger said You've failed to grasp the point, and gone off on an unrelated rant.

OK I give in. You're both right and I'm wrong. The US has imposed a 300% tariff on a Canadian company because Britain voted to leave the EU.

You're conflating two separate issues. Have a go at answering my question... 'What tariff is applied to the wings when they're delivered to Bombardier?' Is it 300%, or is it not?

Bombarded is a Canadian company, it's got nothing to do with US/UK trade relations. Unless you're suggesting that Bombardier are going to sneak the finished aircraft over to Belfast and slap a MADE IN BRITAIN sticker on them before delivering them to the US. What tariff is applied to the wings when they're delivered to Bombardier?

If it wasn't on the side of a bus then it didn't happen.

Confirmed now. Shame, much too young. I had the privilege to see him several times stretching back to 1978. R.I.P.

Oops.

He only posts if he's not really sure.

The top clubs don't want more money for themselves, they want to stop the lower clubs from having it. It's skewing the transfer market, allowing lower clubs to bid (and pay wages) for players they shouldn't.

Forget Corbyn. Take a peek through the curtains and see what's lurking in the shadows behind him.

And Callaghan. It was hard work at times supporting Labour in those days.

She's trying to build a radical support among the active locals to help deflect any awkward questions she will inevitably face over her responsibility over what happened at Grenfell Tower, 'coz she's one of us, ínnit, and it's them wot's to blame.

It's such a bugger that Theresa May chose to hold the election on the one day in the year when millions of labour voters had to stay at home to wash their hair.

On that basis I expect they understand what Ralph is talking about as much as we do.