Lord Duckhunter

So it’s ok to put illegals migrants into some areas but not others. 😂 Typical, it’s always the same. Immigrants welcome, just not near where I live. Let someone else have the “mayhem”. You’ve got people who support immigration, going on about “punishing” areas by putting immigrants there. I thought welcoming immigrants was a good thing, 😂. Now it’s a punishment. Well done to reform, they’ve shone a light on the absolute hypocrisy of the “immigrants welcome” mob. If you vote green, you’re voting for open borders, not open borders, provided they’re not near me. Personally, I’d have MP’s given a free vote on whether they’re housed in their constituencies, the pony excuses will be a delight to see.

Absolutely spot on policy. I’ve posted before that the Government should have a free vote on where asylum seekers are “welcome” and where they can be housed. Watch the hypercritical lefties come out with all sorts of pony as to why they can’t be housed in their constituency. This is local accountability in action, if they’re going to build detention centres, build them where local people want them. Your vote will mean something, you’ll get what you voted for, what’s not to like. Of course, illegal migrants are only “welcome” if they live somewhere else. The Green Party’s new deputy leader Rachel Millward has been branded a “hypocrite” after she shared her “strong objection” to the placement of 600 asylum seekers in her leafy £500,000 local area. In her shared role as Zack Polanski’s subordinate, Ms Millward proudly declared she would hang “the flags of all the nations” to celebrate that “refugees are welcome here”. Despite her previous enthusiasm, Ms Millward expressed her concerns about the use of Crowborough Army Camp to house migrants in a letter to Labour’s Home Office Minister Mike Tapp.

If you have to house less people, will that help as well?

Because the referee made a clear and obvious error. VAR should have corrected that error, but didn’t. So therefore also made an error. Is it really that difficult to understand?

Absolutely it was, but that isn’t what is being alleged. The usual suspect was posting pony claiming the Israeli government let it happen so they could attack Gaza. I was in Israel at the time and the feeling was Netanyahu and the people charged with defending the state had taken their eye off the ball and were too complacent. Anybody who thinks the Israeli government, the IDF or Mossad would deliberately allow this, doesn’t understand the Israeli people or their psyche.

It depends whether they think they’re a better side or not. The best side will win over 2 legs pretty much all the time. Sheffield Utd won 16 more points than Sunderland (had 2 deducted), outplayed them for all but about 15mins of the play off final, and somehow lost. Had that been over 2 legs, they’d have beaten them. No bother… So are they saying 2 legs are better because their quality will overcome us and there’s less likely to be a freak result, or is it some sort of weird logic that the best way to beat a better side, is to play them twice…

Fucking hell, I don’t know what’s more annoying the dopey bird on co commentator or Ref Cam

So VAR did make a mistake then, because that referee decision was a howler. The problem with VAR is it’s the same idiot referees, they brought technology in because referees are useless, then put the same useless referees in charge of it. It is a classic case of the blind leading the blind…

Absolutely, had 7/10 not happened Gaza wouldn’t be in the mess it is now. The Israelis dismantled the Jewish settlements in 2005, and withdrew their troops. There was no major military action from then until 7/10.

That’s not what was said, the claim was Isreal let their civilians be killed, raped and god knows what else, to enable it to decimate Gaza. What has happened to Gaza is a consequence of Hamas’ actions that day, nothing to do with the Israelis allowing it or prompting it. Anyone who thinks this, and therefore posts it, is warped and sick in the mind. Blinded by Jew hatred .

No.i didn’t say it was. He’s an anti semite speculating on 7/10, which is a different thing. Not that there’s much speculating, it’s just a load of old pony. You’d have to be a half wit to believe it was some sort of false flag operation, and you’d have to be narcissistic plank to post it.

Give it a rest you anti semitic twat…

Hibs v Celtic, Hibs down to 10 men (after a ridiculous tackle) equalise with what looks like a blatant handball. The look on the blokes face when the long VAR check confirmed the goal tells it all, even he couldn’t believe it. Remember, if it’s the goal scorer it doesn’t matter whether it was accidental, came off another part of his body, was too close, or in a natural position, if it hits the goal scorers hand, it’s handball…

Of course it was his fault, he misjudged the long punt so had to turn quickly and slipped. There’s not a goal keeper alive who hasn’t made a horrendous balls up once or twice a season (or game, in Baz’s case), but let’s not pretend this one wasn’t 100% down to him. I’m just glad he got the inevitable cock up over and done at a meaningless time in a pretty meaningless fixture…