-
Posts
19246 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
Lord Duckhunter's Achievements
-
The 10 years preceding Blair’s deliberate opening of the floodgates , net migration averaged 40k. We’re now led to believe 170k in little over 6 months isn’t a flood. It’s a ticking time bomb which people like you ignore in the rush to appear kind & moral. As we’ve seen time and time again, the “immigrant’s welcome” crew, really mean “immigrants welcome, just not where I live”. It can be done, look at Poland. Growing at 3.6% & unemployment at record lows. They’ve taken lots of genuine refugees fleeing Ukraine, but don’t take economic migrants pretending to be refugees.
-
They should be kept in a detention centre whilst their claims are processed.
-
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
Lord Duckhunter replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
This is a ridiculous argument. If you take London out of it, there are some incredibly poor areas in the “south” & some affluent areas in the North. Laughable that Burnham is trying to position himself as an outsider set to march on Westminster & its London centric agenda. He’s a Westminster machine politician to his core, he only fucked off back “opp north” after Corbyn smashed him in he’s second failed attempt to become leader. It’s as big a blag as Boris’ “levelling up”, & will be about as successful. Like it or not, London is the key to economic growth, however hard you try any rebalancing or redistribution, if you take money and investment from London or load extra taxes on them , it affects everyone adversely. -
🤣🤣 Love the thought of the Sweaties hanging around waiting to see if their historic victory over the mighty Haiti might be the one, the result which finally gets them out of the group. Why don’t they just fuck off home. Feels as pointless as me hanging around back stage hoping to get a blow job off Shania Twain. About the same odds. Hopefully one day they do it, you never know FIFA might extend it to 84 teams next time..
-
That’s embarrassing, get up FFS
-
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
Lord Duckhunter replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
And she reminded him they won Stephen Fylnns old seat with nearly 50% of the vote, compared to labour who got 5. Yet still he defended Milliband and his lunatic agenda… -
I’ve found Italians to be incredibly friendly or fucking incredibly rude, there doesn’t seem to be anything in between.
-
Ghana looked a far better outfit than Uzbekistan, who were awful defensively and pretty poor going forward.
-
Our centre halves play the ball too slowly & don’t break the lines. I’d have played Stones in that one, at least he can pick a pass. The wingers were wank, particularly Gordon. The subs did better than most (apart from Eze), although O’Reilly really should have scored. Rice doesn’t look right to me, although BBC website made him “player” of the match. I thought it was a pen, would have been disappointed had we not got that at the other end. Also think the Pickford incident could easily have gone the other way. All in all, typical game I’ve watched England produce at multiple World Cups, possession with no urgency
-
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
Lord Duckhunter replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
That makes me question his judgement from the off. 7 pints from that picture -
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
Lord Duckhunter replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
-
Fucking hell, I’m in danger of a heart attack caused by this heat. Some of the birds round here aren’t covering up to protect themselves from the sun, that’s for fucking sure.
-
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
Lord Duckhunter replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
No, Kemi has said one is not required. At least she’s consistent (probably for selfish reasons) unlike Ange, Our Andy & even Starmer, who called for one when the Tories did it. It’s a delicate balance, Brown clearly should have called one, whereas May nearly lost to Corbyn when she did. I’ve no doubt he’d win one, but with a reduced majority. This probably means up to 100 labour MP’s losing their seats, so good luck with selling that to the party. I guess they’ll have a look at the end of the year and see where they are in the opinion polls. Theres a lot to play out yet, Nigel’s standards committee investigation, will the Greens bizarre Left/Islamist coalition last much longer without combusting , and could the Tories produce a rabbit out of the hat to frighten him (like Osbornes inheritance tax blag did to Brown). Interesting months ahead. -
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
Lord Duckhunter replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
Surely everyone, left, right, black, white, commies, pinkos, Far Right, hard left, Romney Marshers can agree on one thing. Steve Bray needs a fucking good hiding…. -
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
Lord Duckhunter replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
His hands are tied by their ridiculous manifesto. They went into an election they were absolutely guaranteed to win, with the most timid un radical manifesto you could ever imagine. How can you spout a load of stuff about “change” and then be as radical as the Tory Pinko’s. If they wanted to do labour things and change the country they should have put it in there. It may have cost them 30 or 40 seats, but fuck me they still would have had a decent majority. If “Andy” tries to do anything other than tinker around the edges, the markets will react & his perceived lack of a mandate will be like a millstone round his neck. He’ll become very unpopular very quickly. If I was advising him, id tell him to go to the people in early autumn, put his change agenda to them. He’ll probably win with a significantly reduced majority, but thats the key word, “majority”. Unless he’s a once in a generation politician who can like Mrs Thatcher transform themselves in office and use his personality to impose himself, he will need a radical mandate. Nothing I’ve seen in his past makes me think he’s anything but a plodder, who has risen to the top due to the lack of any alternative talent the party will accept. As for Starmer, he was clearly out of his depth. But he was chosen as the new Kinnock, supposed to transform the party into something that could win elections. He would lose one, but eat into the Tory majority , ready for the next leader to take them to the promised land (and it wouldn’t have been Andy “King of the North” Burnham either). Unfortunately for him, the Tories were so bad he actually won. He was given a very poor hand and preceded to fuck it right up, whilst blaming everyone else. A horrendous PM, morally questionable , with the charisma of a fucking plank. Good riddance.
