Badger

Almost admire his self belief and confidence but it’s clearly misplaced. Head up his own arse.

Yes but the EFL simply had to make a decision because of the imminent Play Off final only being days away. Such an important fixture with a great deal of sponsorship money and broadcast revenue dependent on the game going ahead at the right time. Could have been serious ructions and financial implications had they postponed it (as opposed to cancelling it) Reinstating Middlesbrough was the easiest option for the EFL at short notice. Not giving Hull a bye or holding a rerun SF of Middlesbrough v Millwall or Wrexham even. But then of course it’s all about the integrity of the game, not the money.

If he is on an FA Board then I’d question whether he should be doing any punditry, never mind giving opinions publicly as a ‘rent a gob’ .

I suspect their decision to appeal might be influenced by the response generally. If it creates a storm then they may feel the need to be seen to challenge it. If as it seems most of the response is a shrug of the shoulders then they’d be more inclined to leave it.

Seems obvious: Shamelessly taken from further up the thread

Overuse of the word “class” here it seems. Can’t take him seriously. Bit of a pet hate how these cretins trot this word out as an all embracing word of approval or disapproval. Not sure ‘class’ would be recognised in his part of the world. Skate twat.

Overlooking the fact they were still shit enough to beat a Russell Martin managed Saints 3-2 away from home after Maresca left.

I really wonder who and how we pursued the credible alternatives, was Lankshear a possibility, and who else ? Did we look at Ure for example ? Or did we spend too long pursuing the Serbian bloke from Lazio ? Spertsyan Mk II it seems.

Bristol City ? Deserves credit for that don’t you think? Lincoln, inexcusable I agree. Overall fearing you’ll be proved right mind, but trying to give some balance in assessing him on limited appearances.

This is one reason you really have to question our response to it, and legal advice we brought in. Why didn’t we create over the possible fact members of the panel might be conflicted before the event ? No good bleating about it afterwards and trying to recover lost ground. Badly handled it seems. Seems we were badly advised and tactically naive in our approach. Parsons has taken much of the blame for a muppetry approach, but shame Dragan didn’t send in the big guns from the outset. (IMHO as someone used to say)

I don’t think he was the profile we needed as a CF to rotate with Larin and think we could have aimed for better BUT in fairness to him in limited appearances; Scored v Stoke Nearly on hand to toe poke another v Millwall (had it not gone in) Showed some power/pace v Bristol City to create for Azaz. That doesn’t seem a bad return, and is promising. (Yes he was shit at Lincoln, but above gives some hope of what he might achieve).

Think you’re missing the point. By bringing him in on loan and not spending big on a CF we freed up funds to buy Dobbin. Clouds, silver linings and all that.

Surprisingly moderate. I was expecting longer. Think most would have accepted a six week ban, let alone it being suspended.

Reading their forum there are some hysterical and self righteous bellends there, some still wallowing in enjoying their victim status. But there are many reasoned posters just saying get over it, let’s move on, get on with the season. Fair play to them. All in all, just a range of opinions some more reasoned than others. Typical of any online forum and set of fans. Including our own.

From what I’ve read yes it is specific to the spying