egg

Absolutely. If any saints fan says that they were entertained tonight, or in the Ipswich game, or the countless other games where we shot ourselves in the foot because of RM's stupid tactics and game management, they're mental. Give me Puel esque football over this flouncy naive bollox every day of the week.

We did not lose because of McC and because we missed Baz. The problems are all over the pitch, but start with a badly coached back 4.

Yep. That was embarrassing, but highlighted what most people have been seeing and saying. Absolutely shambolic tactics, passing for the sake of it, wrong team selection, wrong subs, wrong manager.

I shall celebrate the day of my favourite Turk with a large doner tonight. Only right to mark the occasion.

We're overloaded imo with first team players in that area. It's poor that at least one of SAA or Dibling can't make the match day 20. No good for the lads or the club as youngsters need to see that they'll get a chance.

Teams and scorers below. Why is SAA playing with the kids? I know he is one, but he's better than that and needs to develop by playing mens football.

Santa

Mythical

Ray

Yes

3 goals. 0 for them. Only stats that matter.

Well that wasn't too bad was it. The score could be anything tonight.

That's the only logical decision.

Hmm. Contracts I've seen usually deem involvement as being in the match say squad, which plainly he was He may have something based on the chosen team and bench thou. Still, bloody odd to bring him from outside the 20 to start.

Wtf is that about?! Not good enough for the bench, but given the nod to start over the fella who was on the bench. Bonkers.

Not for me, he's arguably our most important player. I'd play him every time he's available to play.

Yep, half a case for Edozie as well. Decent side overall though. Our best back 4 and midfield. Scrappy 2-1 win, and breathing right down Leeds and Leicester's necks.

Personally I think he's off, just, but I wouldn't call it clear. We'd be fuming if that was against us and the goal was given.

That's not violent conduct for me. Not worthy a 3 match ban. That said, he doesn't deserve any more game time so quite happy that RM has to look to others.

High

That's the religion of the victim. You also mentioned the possibile religion of the perpetrator. If it's relevant, we'll be told.

So having asked SoG why he felt the need to introduce religion, why have you? I'll wait to see what the facts are before making any assumptions about the assailant.

Blackbird

Cheers 👍