egg

Yep. Free speech is fine, as long as it's what people want to here.

Horsemen

It's penance for buying pre cooked gravy.

I think it's right that a political party can put forward a senior figurehead of it's choosing to fight it's cause. The Tories shoved Boris up front and centre as it's salesman for Brexit. Alas, the idiot did a good job. Farage won't do so well, but if he helps dilute the Tories sway, so much the better for me.

Change of tactics I think, but yep, his form did drop.

Why shouldn't the owner of Reform be put forward as it's mouthpiece? It's not as though they have MP's, yet.

I'm with you on Broja. The talent he had hasn't gone anywhere, and he could be brilliant for us.

He's Downes ++ and would have been brilliant. I think you're right though.

One plus Charles isn't enough for me. Two as a minimum. It's such a crucial role, and if you take the main man out, another is needed. There's a young lad at Chelsea coming back from injury who'd be ideal on loan.

We can't go into a PL season relying on Charles imo. If we get Downes, we need 2 who can play deep, and 3 if we don't. Aribo can't play that role in the PL.

Because he's the front of Reform UK. I can't stand the fella, or his party, but we live in a democracy and there can't be any genuine complaint about him getting air time in the build up to the election.

Any good? Mrs E keeps banging on about it, but I'm gonna need some persuasion to go into town for cake and sarnies.

Blimey Hypo, you'll give yourself an ulcer at this rate mate. It's only a forum. Being "right" honestly doesn't matter. Call me old fashioned, but I focus on facts, not opinion. You've plastered a video on here of one man's opinion which just happens to align with yours. You keep doing that poppet if it helps you justify your views to yourself. Perhaps try checking some facts and history, you'll learn plenty.

You wouldn't put it past him! Credit to his lawyer for making a cheeky adjournment application.

Quattro

So basically you've scoured the web and found a video of a semi plausible sounding bloke who thinks like you do. Bravo Hypo, you've managed to justify you to you.

Ha!! You're as ill informed and close minded as anyone on here, despite your best efforts to persuade yourself otherwise.

You disregard/laugh at/get confused by anything that doesn't align with you politically. Have some consistency.

Israel conceded ground after that. Read the Taba summit details and Mortinos non papers that I mentioned. Israel refused to talk after a change of government. That's the reality.

It'll take a while longer yet to get Egypt to open it's border.

Channel

Hamas came into power on the back of what happened in 2000/01 and the aftermath. On the remainder, we're largely in agreement, I think. Gaza cannot be ruled by Hamas. There'll never be a prospect of peace, and Israel cannot live safely alongside Palestine, with the attitude of it's current government. Both sides need a fundamental change of attitude and direction, and what we've seen over recent years and from 7/10 will not be changed by aggression. No chance. Despite what some feel, there must be dialogue, a willingness for mutual change, and then change. We've almost been there, and day by day, that prospect is getting further away.

You irritate me, that's what comes across. As for the wider picture, this situation was almost resolved by dialogue in 2000/01. A change of Israeli government put paid to the talks. That's a fact. If dialogue nearly ended it then, it can end it now. Please tell me how you can see the relentless Israeli aggression ending this. Please don't kid yourself that you have better morals than SoG.

No anger, no bitterness. I just have no time for people who demonstrate zero understanding of the wider picture or context. You're one of a few.

You're an intolerable, narrow minded thick cunt mate. Do a bit of research on the subject, if you can, and you may gain some actual understanding.