egg

No. Not a great phone either. If you want a budget android, get an orange san Francisco. Similar spec to wildfire but better screen and half the price. Rooted means hacked basically, allowing updates of roms (os) and other stuff. Have a look at modaco.com for advice, tips, buying guides.

You can try but no guarantee of success. Those expenses seem reasonable, but you have a duty to Keep your losses down. You can't just sit back and let your losses build up.

They have had every chance to put it right but have not. I am not sure why you want leverage for repairs from a garage who are not up to it and/or dont give a monkeys. You are left with two choices. 1. Suing for your cash back with no car inbetween, and no guarantee of success or 2. getting it fixed and suing for the cost, with imo every chance of success. Plus the proceedings will be simpler and cheaper. Either way you will need proper evidence of the problem, and what is needed to rectify. If you were a client if mine I would urge you to look at option 2. End of the day its a car with a mechanical problem which will be fixable.

You are missing the point. You get it fixed and bill them.

I have owned iphone and android phones. Apple can only upgrade their phones. Android phones in contrast, change and improve frequently due to the volume of suppliers. I honestly cannot see what Apple offers over Android. Can somebody who has owned both tell me what I have overlooked apart from a slinky case.

In a manner of speaking! To be fair he is a better full back than politician, but a top drawer entertainer.

Cheers, Armitage got banned in the rugby for less. Moreover, who gave him the number ten shirt?! Madness.

Superb, the bloke is great. I loved his turn on that celeb footy thing on the telly when he came on, minced about and then properly ****ted someone with an outrageous tackle. Have a Google, his finest moment.

http://www.google.co.uk/imgres?q=adam+el-abd+injury&hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&hs=cjD&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&biw=1280&bih=878&tbm=isch&tbnid=MjlHVFjLRzJrlM:&imgrefurl=http://www.footballforums.net/forums/showthread.php/268354-El-Abd-s-injury-%28Mod-Warning-Image-not-for-faint-hearted%29&docid=k1OBMBr5BHwN5M&w=915&h=686&ei=sbOMTsi4MoGw8QPo7aTbCg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=633&vpy=338&dur=7197&hovh=194&hovw=259&tx=138&ty=120&page=1&tbnh=156&tbnw=208&start=0&ndsp=20&ved=1t:429,r:17,s:0

But isn't that because it was introduced by a rugby man and most fans, and dirty harry, couldn't see how rugby ideas could translate to football?

And that's the point. Any increase has to be commercial and factor in basic supply and demand. We could have a demand for 32k tickets and sell them all at a premium, but only be able to sell significantly more at a lesser cost. Who knows. The point is that we need demand for much more than 32k to make any increase viable as the investment would have to wipe its' own face and turn a profit. I would love to see us in massive stadium filled to the rafters, but also want to see us run as a commercially minded business. On the (lack of) evidence available we cannot achieve both.

That's a good read. I have trained in the distant past with Jo Tessem, Dan Petrescu and a few others and given them more than a run for their money. I now see a lot of the younger lads at David Lloyd and the condition they are in is incredible, far better than the above when they were at their peak. Shows how times have changed. You've only got to look at the condition of Nick Harvey to see that our players are in capable hands/

I just put MLG into an online code breaker and it came up with ADHD. Weird.

FFS do you never give up? Ever heard the phrase agree to disagree? Just about every person who has posted on this thread has come down against you. I know you're a fighter, and that's a nice quality, but just throw the towel in and call it a night.

That post referred to nine clubs! I merely mentionef wolves as you have been banging on about them. You overlook the other eight clubs, and all the other contra evidence on this thread. Please, please give it up as you are just making yourself look a tool.

we are not wolves.

I despair. The thread I referred to dealt with the increases in attendances for clubs after promotion (we have not been promoted). One if those clubs was wolves. I have not drawn any comparisons between us and wolves. You have. I have said that there is no evidence of s need for a bigger stadium if we get promoted. You have given no evidence, just a bizarre reference to wolves. I really am bored with you now so fill your boots and enjoy the last naive word.

We are not wolves. What they do is irrelevant. Bags of apples and bags of pears etc.

Because we are not wolves. We are not established in the prem. You are beyond simple.

You are pinning all your hopes on the court giving repudiation. Thats a risk. The court may decide that you get damages to put it right. Either way the court will want to know what is actually wrong with the car. If you bring a claim you will need to show that, with evidence. The aa call out stuff diagnoses the symptoms, not the cause. You need more. Someone will be able to diagnose the fault, price to fix it and do the job. To be blunt, you will get little sympathy from the court if you dont even explore that option.

See the poking fun post re attendances which include wolves. Like delldays, I have no interest in wolves and see no relevance to any decision they make to us. Please read the overwhelming sense written by the likes of poking fun. Then wind your neck in.

Glasgow, what needs to be done to put the car right, ie what would it cost? The court could allow you to repudiate the contract (basically a refund) but there can be no guarantee. The proceedings will cost a fortune and take many months. If it's a few hundred to fix why not get on with it and send the bill. If they dont pay then sue. They are much more likely to cough up a lesser sum. If they dont, the claim will be a small claim with less court fees to pay and less aggro. Added bonus is you have a car to drive.

That is all boll ox. None of it addresses the fact that there is no evidence of substantial demand for tickets on a regular basis, or whether the outlay would reap a return. We disagree, so reply all you like but I can't be arsed to keep trying to help you understand the bloody obvious.

Mlg, waiting lists for season tickets, fans complaining they cant get in, away teams demanding more seats, an upturn in economic conditions, reassurance that the seats would pay for themselves within a few years. The obvious really.

This is getting tedious, besides I am trying to watch shameless. You plainly don't get it. Evidence is not a guess, or assumption. Seats cost millions so there has to be near certainty that they will be sold regularly, and that the return would justify the expense.