egg

To be fair, there's a few semi's over him being an Arab.

Briefs

Yep, and I'm not sure what he's doing in a thread about Gisele Pelicot either.

Possibly both, but certainly naive, and not forward thinking.

Agreed. Virtue signalling his bitten them on the arse.

Chances are it'll be one of those 4.

Yep. Get spanked 5 nil at home, have a cup game a couple of days later against probably the best team in the world, have a caretaker manager in who's never trained the team, so allow the players a day with their feet up. Beyond ridiculous.

I like that but unless ABK has suddenly started training with the 1st team, he ain't playing. I'd also have Aribo ahead of Lesley.

Yesterday it looked like Sundays were a day off too.

And I was responding to that point, and your perpetually blinkered view. It's not all about Israel.

You consistently write as if Israel is the only middle east state that matters. Syria need stability and security for itself and it's people. Ditto Iraq, Lebanon, the Palestinians, etc.

Depends on the terms of their contract. He may be stuck with the fella for ages. What we're being told is plausible imo.

This latest round of nonsense started with a make him stop post from you, followed by the predictable. You then claim to have put SoG on ignore, so post another daft goading post. It's pathetic, and the forum is a hell of a lot worse for it.

I've never labelled anyone on here a narcissist, and wouldn't.

We could be next season. Souness ain't the answer for us though. The wrong man, yep, unqualified, no.

His posts are designed to get a reaction of some sort - that's one purpose of SM and forums. He gets that. If people think that taking the piss in response adds anything positive to the forum that's a matter for them, but it doesn't.

Limp

I wouldn't want him here personally, but it's pretty obvious that a a 71 year old who has played and managed at the top level, and has stayed close to the game in the media, is qualified to be involved.

You've described the bait taking process in action.

That's your interpretation, but other people don't use it in that way. I don't currently have anyone on ignore, but if a poster is irritating me, I've used it a couple of times to avoid being faced with loads of annoying posts from them. If I chose to look, there's nowt wrong with that. Multiple threads are being dominated by the same old predictable responses to a predictably dull / attention seeking post from SoG. He can't argue on his own, but he'll carry on if people keep taking his bait.

This has been done to death mate. People put people on ignore so that they don't have to be bored by the stuff they post, but can take a look if they want to. On the wider Point of SoG. He is irritating AF, but many threads are ruined by people reacting to him and making the thread about him rather than the subject. It's become more irritating than SoG tbh.

Mummy

Thanks. They're a proper mixed bag. You've then got the factions in other parts of the country, and the Kurds. I can foresee all sorts of jockeying for power and policies, and a very long journey to stability.

£70k @ week in for him and about £20k a week in total for his staff (they'll need paying up as well) gets us to that. Would be that stupid?

I agree with that, and given that the game is up this season, I'd be happy with a caretaker until the right man is found. I'd also like to see no money wasted in the window - let the new bloke rebuild over the summer.