SaintRichmond

Has Benitez been sacked by the Mad Russian yet ??? Ho Ho Ho

Shotguns in hand

OK, but this is Pompey, right ?? So, as per usual, nothing will be done, no challenges to it's legality will be made, and the FL will blindly sit back and let it happen. Now, if it were the likes of Luton or Bournemouth doing this, the FL would have them already playing in Hants IV at the least Does ANYONE in Authority, outside of Pompey Island, actually KNOW this is going on ??

Make sure you don't have to pay postage for it

He did come back .... to guide us to near extinction

I too would love to see them not get away with it, but "just" and "fair" are things that have NEVER applied to Portsmouth Other Clubs that have breached Rules, and have subsequently been punished by the Football League, to the point where they have in effect been demoted two Divisions and/or nearly put out of existance ... for "crimes" far less than those that Portsmouth have racked up over a great length of time Yet, by comparison to other Clubs punished by the FL, all we have seen is a " Softly Softly " approach by the Fl Most people se this as being "something rotten in the State of Denmark " So WHY are the FL pussy footing around ? By comparison, Bournemouth would have ALREADY had points deducted, fined etc, yet Portsmouth have had multiple Admins, have had MILLIONS wiped off for pittances ... AND ARE STILL TRADING So, I ask again, what Historical hold have Portsmouth over the Football Authorities, because they are certainly NOT being dealt with as would a Club by any other name

Only if your name is Luton, Bournemouth etc Portsmouth ? No Can't prove it, but Just wait and see

Just for starters, they have blatently allowed one of "theirs" to continue trading whilst being insolvent for years

As I understood it, in Law "will be required to" is not an edict, it is a "request" Now, if the FL had said " the -10 Penalty comes into force, once the Club exits Administration ", then that is a categoric statement. I still say that the FL, for some historic reason, most likely many funny handshakes, will bend over backwards (pun intended) to let the lying cheats get away with every little scam going The FL are themselves bringing the game into disrepute Disgusting FL, they should be ashamed of themselves

You can read it any way you wish, but I would bet anybody that the Football League will NOT impose the -10 For some "historical" reason, Portsmouth has a "hold" over the Football Authorities, and they will not let one of their most "beloved" go to the wall, or face any crippling handicap Plus of course, no prospective "rescuer" would work under such a handicap

Simple ..... ANY part of the ground qualify's as a toilet

It's a smokescreen, shock tactics etc etc They will NEVER be liquidated, simply because the Football League will NOT let it happen to one of "theirs" Chainrai will now be "approved" by the Gutless FL

Sounds just like the wife

I thought thr FL only "indicated" that they would query Chainrai's FAPP credentials, BUT, at that stage they didn't actually have to make a decision, so they didn't If Chainrai does "re-appear" then the FL will have to scout round their offices to see if anyone has aquired any BALLS, because, horror, horror, someone will have to make a DECISION

Or ... Appy days

It was £200,000 ............ or, in Pompey language £200.00

You missed one ... "The crowd must change places with the players at half time "

I see Appless used the phrase "ever so well" Wondered where he got that from ?

John Bedwood I believe

Roll on 2014 then

I sincerely hope that that is correct (I wish I could still be allowed to trade, after being insolvent for circa 2 YEARS )

OK, I hear what you say, but :- "Will be required" is NOT the same as "has been deducted" etc I'm not a lawyer, but I am told that "will be required" CAN be challenged

At the end of the day, this WILL happen. The FL are GUTLESS Portsmouth will then get a Universal Diploma for being the Longest Insolvency "Business" in Histoy.r For that fact alone, the Football League should charge THEMSELVES for bringing the game into disrepute.

OK, but does that mean that if it had been a Prem Fixture, he would have made tha same ELEVEN changes ?? Doesn't make sense Nigel

Don't be daft ...... he'll be retired by the time he's 60