SaintRichmond

Good morning Stanley ......I've missed your posts denouncing my comments .... hope you are well ??? ..... Big Day today looks like ??:)

Or was it .... "coup de grace " ..........

Yes, the lure of coming to a Div 1 Club in Admin has proved too strong for him ....

..... "well, this is our current training ground, and when I get back, we'll have to use it as our Main ground, as I will have sold St Mary's .... I mean, you can't expect us to play in that big place, now that we are a struggling Div 1 Team now can you ??? .......... by the way, my name is Rupert ..... " PS. to my Customers ...Last season has been well worth it, stringent cuts, relegation, Admin, etc etc....... just to get me back even stronger than before. Well done Marc ..... (cheque in post) .........(hope Barclays don't bounce that one .........)

IF he is under contract ... then he plays .......SO, is he under contract or not ?? If he REFUSES to play, he'll be in breach of contract .... So don't PAY him Simple ...

IF he is still under CONTRACT, and IF we cannot SELL him, and IF we cannot LOAN him ...... THEN PLAY HIM Might as well get some use out of him ..... saves him wasting on the bench whilst still earning Mega Bucks ......

Like putting off every prospective bidder ............ he has well over 12 years experience in doing that

Slight Flaw Stanley ...... what if Jackson is the "Last Man Standing" out of a starting line up of circa 35 "interested" parties ???

Dead right my friend .. Simple logic .. Is he still alive ? ... Yes Has he emigrated ? ... No Is he too quiet ? ... Yes Does he love the Saints ? ... Yes (his opinion) Has he got unfinished business ? ... Oh Yes Is his middle name Limpet ? ... Yes He's involved SOMEWHERE ..... put your mortgage on it .... PS ... Jackson is just the sort of Stooge he'd use as a front man .........

I can't imagine ................

I hope you are right .... the last thing we want is to be lumbered with a rescue package that leaves us further in the Muck than we were .... Ideally, a clean slate ......( you can't buy much if you are already in hock )

Most likely the deal will be that all current debts have been cleared ..... but the Stadium has been remortgaed yet again, and we will now be in debt to the tune of £100M, to be paid back over 250 years ......... .... We will NOT get the clean slate that some people think we will have ..... just the same old minefields ...... with twice as many mines

Most likely a " Fire Sale " ........... sounds familiar ......should appease the creditors though

.... but Div 2 is OK then ????

Please Educate me then ???

And then Fry "waived" the £500K for Jackson/Green/Others Consortium ....Hmmm

After having Lowe in charge for over twelve years, at the moment I can see little real difference between the options as you put them With Lowe we will have NO GROWTH .... no change there. Going bust ??? ..... as opposed to (continuing) to sink even lower down the Leagues under Lowe People seem to forget one vital thing. Over his previous TWO "Reigns", he has NEVER been here for the benefit of SAINTS. He has always openly said he was here as Chairman of the PLC ..... A VAST DIFFERENCE I will back ANYONE .... as long as it in no way involves Lowe As the Meerkats say .... "Simple"

I said that from Day One ...

I think he would say yes .... .. A False Dawn, IMHO Out of the frying pan ... into the frying pan Saving the Club is one thing ..... but back to how it's been for over 12 years of Non growth ...... it would not be long before only the Chapel End would be open

Funny how things just suddenly start falling into place .... what say you Stanley ???r

A) If SFC is in Admin, then no contracts can be offerred B) If SFC is NOT in Admin, then they can C) If the League do not object or block such conttact activity, then they will deem it to be OK D) If they deem it OK, then they are acknowledging the fact that SFC is NOT in Admin E) If SFC is not ( as per "D" ) in Admin, . WHY are they docking us 10 points ???

.... The last bottle of Guinness ???

No .... What we fans say on here counts for Zilch in terms of us being in Admin ...... Surely, it is the Gullibility of Fry you should be queationing ...... it is he who is taking Jackson seriously ....... any thoughts as to WHY Stanley ???

In the spirit of what you say ..... THAT in itself makes you wonder exactly WHY ( apparently ) Fry is taking him "seriously" ?????? .... I mean, at Bournemouth, he couldn't even guarentee that there was sand on the beach ..........