Rod Le Shearer

those two lines you have quoted are not confusing at all,they are perfectly in alignment with each other. how can anyone be confused by two identical statements ?? and in regards to your scenario: nothing happens that harms my statement,which we have agreed meets the requirements of a fact. just as you agree that its a well known fact that future nights will follow present days(*1), you surely must agree that sometime (eventually) night wont follow day. ergo: the statement you have recognized as a fact(*1),can in fact change whenever..just like my initial FACTUAL statement mmmmmmm...

no,you are not a tool...just another person who missed the point (which is,for the third time: saying night follows day,isnt the same as what I said-"this day will be followed by this night") said in another way: we cant know if this night will follow this day,still we regard it as fact. hence my statement could also be viewed as a fact,guided by those principles. simple,really !

I didnt say "day following night",my uneducated friend. I said that its a FACT that TODAY is being followed by TONIGHT,and thats a big difference. If you willingly accept that statement as a fact,then you must (in order not to be a self-contradicting tool) also accept my initial statement as fact. if you view the principles in one statement as valid,then you cant just change your mind for the other statement-which consists of exactly the same principles. now is that an opinion,or a fact ?

having trouble reading,are we..?? I`ve said its a fact waiting to happen...much like the fact that this day WILL be followed by night ! or would you disagree with that last statement..?

do you really think Norwic will only take 4 more points in their nine matches..?? the minimum number of points gained in order to avoid relegation,will be over 50 ! and that`s not only my opinion,its a FACT waiting to happen

its now officially back in our own hands win our game in hand,and we leapfrog Blackpool and out of the bottom three ! COYR

II think we all would be mad as hell if the shoe was on the other foot ! that was a clear-cut penalty,the main reason being the position of Perry`s arm. It was stretched out,and not remotely in a natural position. thus,according to the book...just as clear a penalty as the one we were given ! at a stretch one might even argue that the Cardiff player just was trying to protect his face,while Perry..err,was just stupid

II think we all would be mad as hell if the shoe was on the other foot ! that was a clear-cut penalty,the main reason being the position of Perry`s arm. It was stretched out,and not remotely in a natural position. thus,according to the book...just as clear a penalty as the one we were given ! at a stretch one might even argue that the Cardiff player just was trying to protect his face,while Perry..err,was just stupid

I`ve just seen the highlights from Saintstv,and from that angle I can`t quite see what was so special about KD`s save ! the header came in the keepers height,wasnt to hard & didn`t seem to be more than a yard away from him. besides,after reading reports on here,I was lead to believe it was a "double-save",but in fact the two situations (although good saves) were not related nor had any influence on each other. IMO,Perry`s handball was just as clear as Cardiffs..lucky escape there !

You got a link ?

no,the person referred to in the threads title..! should be obvious from my post,really. anyway..no malice in that question,the thread title just reminded me of another legendary pre-match chat/interview anyone know what I`m on about ?? (not football related,sorry)

ain`t he ugly ?

almost right ! it was his son,Uday Hussein,who was Minister of sports-and thus effectively acting as a Director of Football in Iraq. after they lost,he was known to lock the team up in a dark prison cells,and sometimes performed "light" torture on the poor souls... Makes Lowe seem like a real SAINT

nope,one was in the second half in a perfect hattrick all goals should be in one half,no other players scoring in between,and scored with left foot,right foot and head. still,a hattrick like that one from Saga next weekend would be more than perfect for me & us,I believe ! and...what magnificent goals those two against Preston were. only Stern John,of our recent players,could have buried that first one..absolute class !

come on lads....all hail Mr. Nostradamus ! but seriously..get a grip.

thats an interesting point. IMO Saga COULD have brought 10 extra points,but that is only if he shows the sort of form he has found since his return. one player is very rarely responsible for ten points more/less. Man U without Ronaldo would still be top of the PL this year.. on the other hand..for all you conspiracy-theory lovers: maybe Lowe knew Saga was capable of doing this,and thus could effectively end Lowe`s regime (administration equals Lowe off)

talk about kill-joy,eh ? that man is the most depressing individual on planet earth.

Saganowski is a ****ing GOD today !!

we`re all over them. now we need a second goal,or else you know what happens when 89 minutes have been played !

just look it up,istead of nagging and boring the hell out of people following the match.

if the shoe was on the other foot (Preston NOT winning in 9),I`d be more worried ! and remember,we broke Readings fabulous Championship home record earlier this season.. COYR

well said. I`m impressed someone actually bothered to explain the situation to the OP. either he is the most stupid,slowest entity in the world..or he is on a plain wind-up mission. in either case the making of this thread is just complete and utter nonsense and waste of web-space. all the answers which the original poster couldnt find within his own limited brain,are really obvious and self-evident for all thinking beings.

that side must be the slowest in the CCC.. cant see how we are going to counter any goals in,lets hope for a fluke or maybe a (unlikely) goal from a corner ! pace seems surgically removed from our team,its quite disgusting.

aaaw bless. I`m sure we all feel very sorry for you,Alpine ! after all..its not as if your good old mild-tempered self have ever handed out some abuse on here,is it..??

I liked the headline of this topic,sort of intriguing. BUT what a major disappointment I was in for,when reading & realizing there was no truth,just a blinkered opinion from some poor soul desperate to live in the past ! move on,FFS...this topic has been done to the death at least 10 times before at this forum.