St_Tel49

Yep - the first person to sell should be our leading goal scorer. Cn't blame him for going. Insufficiently appreciated here.

You've been drinking - haven't you? ;-)

Would you pay the wages he would clearly expect in League 1. To my mind what he delivers for Poland is irrelevant (actually, not that much there either) - he has delivered little for us over the past couple of years. It's not that I think he is not capable but, to me, he is a player who operates within his comfort zone. You only see something from him when he has something to gain from it. I suspect my judgement might be confirmed by the fact that he will still be around at the start of the season - that is, if we are still around.

Over simplistic - he took a truly duff decision by not keeping Pearson but the seeds of the administration were sown by the previous regime. Lowe must, but won't, take his share of blame but you are truly blinkered if you think that it was entirely his fault. PS I thought that Stanley was desperate for administration. Now he has it. It stinks a bit - doesn't it.

Why? What has Saga done in the last 2 years to justify the wages he clearly thinks he is worth?

The problem is Wessex is that it is looking more and more like he was right. That is as unpalatable to me as it is to you. I would not choose his rather aggressive mode of expressing his views but sometimes it needs someone with an unsentimental approach to bring a balance.

For once - I desperately hope you are right. The continued existence of this club is more important than anything else right now

H'mmm, I think that drink might have been taken ;-)

Gingelettiss - you either know more than you are letting on or you have a blind faith. I don't know anything and I lack your blind faith

Mole/Stanley - its become increasingly clear that you -very sadly i have to say - have backed a bum steer. Live with it. Equally sadly so must the rest of us.

Dear Mr Tac-Tics, Thank you for your interest in our post but with your experience and talent we feel you would much more suited to the potentially vacant post at a club just down the road. There, we would hope that your heart would very much rule your head and that we could resume our derbies in the Blue Square League in a couple of years time. Yours sincerely St_Tel49 pp M. Le Tissier ;-)

I cannot help feeling that the us being given another 15 points makes no sense at any level. The FL have carried out an investigation and concluded that there is no material difference between SLH and SFC and therefore hit us with 10 points. Surely a settlement that makes SLH creditors happy must make the creditors of SFC happy since, according to dear old Dr Death and his crew, they are the same. Why do both need a CVA?

Do you still stand by that now?

I have a horrible feeling that we have just wasted a whole month and the last 7 days have filled me with no confidence at all. It now seems to me that if the Swiss had got in first we would have been done and dusted by now instead of this protracted nonsense. I really was optimistic about Pinnacle but I am now feeling very, very flat. I just want to buy my season ticket and get back to watching football.

He's only the mirror image of you under the previous regime. You got what you wanted and just look at how much we are enjoying it

http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?p=328567#post328567

People keep saying this but why would we get another 15 off? If our creditors are happy why the further deduction?

Tired of Waiting - The Kinks ;-)

Some of you guys really are paranoid. You must dream about Lowe. I could not see Cowen, for one, ever wanting to be involved in the club again.

I hope you are right - like every other Saints fan I just want this settled so I can buy my season ticket and get on with watching football again

Just three points on this 1) I'd have him back in a flash 2) He ain't coming back - why would he? 3) ..but I'd love to be wrong.

This is the bit I don't get. If MJ does not have a credible takeover package - why is Fry giving him the time of day? He - Fry - does not seem like an idiot.

There has been a lot of opinion that he is not credible - not quite the same thing. Don't misunderstand me - I desperately want the Pinnacle bid to succeed - but there seems to me that there has been a sudden burst of posts here this evening aimed at discrediting Jackson and implying that he has tried to foul up the Pinnacle bid by getting at the Football League. If that really is true then he should be suspended by his goolies from a gantry at Fratton Park but I am not going to blindly accept that he did such a thing without some proveable support for it. As a PS - my comment above was really more of a follow up to Mole's post on another thread.

There are questions and questions. While I am no legal expert even I can see the innuendo. I am sure a good libel lawyer could make something of it. If there are serious problems about Jackson then there must be facts to back it up. Proveable facts are not libellous so if they exist let's hear them. I, for one, am sick of the nose tapping statements that people like mole, among others, come out with.

I'm not interested in your opinion - only facts. If you have any then spit them out - its only right that the rest of us should know.