St_Tel49

This

That will reduce the post count to about 1 a week for most people

You may be at odds with the professionals there - but we'll see.

I wasn't so much questioning that fact that you might want to sell him, as the price you were willing to sell him at hence the "give away the family silver". By that same token you might have sold Walcott for a couple of mill and Bale for 500k. This lad is easily as good as them. PS I don't believe that keeping Chamberlain had any influence on our intention to recruit new players if Cortese's interview is anything to go by. We had offers in that were turned down because the greedy so and sos thought that we were getting £10m and they wanted some of it.

Well then, I am glad that it is NC and not you that runs the club. Why not just give the family silver away? It should make room for some cheap ornaments.

Any proof of this?

Oh there is - its the Mail!

Yes - and look at how accurate the newspapers turned out to be on that!

Perhaps because NC has already addressed the issue. He has categorically said that the family are continuing to support him and if there was any point at which they didn't (emphasizing that this was unlikely) he had a back up in place for alternative finance. To ignore that in favour of some old flapdoodle foisted on you by a paper with a dodgy record for accuracy seems to me to be plain naive.

That's right - just let it all out!

No that would be Paedant. I think I'll go to bed.

And barge a whole mass of players out of the way? One maybe - several, no.

ignore. I forgot the quote and cannot get back to include it. My comment makes no sense without it. Essentially agreeing with Benji.

For the first goal Seaborne was weak - very weak. Admittedly Davies should have protected his near post better but the shot should never have been got away in the first place. I'm still struggling to see how Davies could be blamed for the second. The real blame was allowing the cross in the first place. I don't think Bart would have made any difference. I'm not convinced that he would have made some of the other stops that Davis made.

Why? They all have egg on their face about AOC - why should you believe this unsubstantiated drivel too? Your faith in newspaper reports is truly touching.

That implies that someone in an offside position can deliberately distract a defence while someone else runs in from an onside position. Is that really acceptable within the rules?

Good morning Mr Gray!

Trousers, normally I would take the line that you are taking but what makes no flaming sense at all is that fact that he can buy match tickets but not a season ticket. If his misdemeanour is so heinous why is he even being allowed to buy match tickets? The club has been offered the opportunity to make its case to a recognised body and has chosen not to take it. In making judgements when information is sparse I tend to go with the balance of probabilities and, to me, the balance of probabilities is that NC is being petty. I tend to support NC's position on most things but I find it difficult to do so on this one.

Indeed - and it only costs a fiver too

This pretty much sums up my view. If he can buy tickets for games then there is no conceivable reason why he should not have a season ticket. And, as others have said, HE has never claimed to speak for fans, it is the media who have. By the way, I don't know him.

There's nothing like giving him a chance - eh!

Go on - lock it now! I dare you

but it will cost him £500 + VAT

This - the media frenzy has been what many of us suspected - based on bollux.

But not win