Jump to content

St_Tel49

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    2,748
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by St_Tel49

  1. WHy not? He was highly enough rated to be on the bench a couple of times this year.
  2. What if everyone did it ?
  3. Over reaction on both fronts methinks.
  4. I have an auto version of one of these. I cannot fault it and the engine is quite nippy
  5. Steven Davis is a definite gainer. This approach clearly suits him and he has given close to MoM performances in the past couple of games
  6. His @rse
  7. Two of the top teams - he played against Man U too.
  8. But not when they were playing for us - Bale possibly. They are all much better players now (through growth and experience) than they were then but Scheiderlin's performances for us now are better than any that they delivered.
  9. In which case it was a penalty and LGTL is still right
  10. Do all three relegated teams routinely get promoted again? All part of the same argument!
  11. Actually it could mean a lot if it gives us confidence that we can play those tactics in other games. We just need to add goals to it.
  12. Surely it would be unlikely that NC would be directly involved in something like this. Perhaps a note directly to him about it might lead to a couple of backsides being kicked. Mind you I'm only speculating.
  13. There's the rub - its a typical web forum tactic of trying to reduce many faceted view points to a single fatuous label.
  14. Turkish talking CoC as usual
  15. A sweeping assertion. I would suggest that with no interference he would have carried on improving our position.
  16. Yes - but who thought of bringing them in?
  17. Rubbish. Leave aside the first few games against top opposition and taking account of the learning curve their record is far from mediocre
  18. Only what some journalist has said. I have no idea how he would know.
  19. I don't see him claiming to speak on behalf of Saints supporters. He probably got rung by a journalist, asked for his reaction , and gave it. I didn't notice him saying anything I radically disagreed with.
  20. Well that clarifies everything!!!!
  21. One of the more plausible reasons given for Pardew's sacking was that NC had discovered he was talking to Newcastle. NC did not approve of such underhand dealings. If true then we have a classic example of double standards - you can't be underhand - I can.
×
×
  • Create New...