St_Tel49

The club cannot do anything about it. Is the law and the club cannot be seen to condone it.

I have been sitting in the Kingsland North for several years now and no-one round me for quite a distance has ever stood. I don't know where you are but I am more than happy for it to be confined it to there.

Give it up - he was fouled, end of.

MoD angle showed that AL was pulled over so your embarrassment is misplaced

Having watched it on MoD - no he didn't,

We need our fullbacks to have pace. There are not too many CBs who would be as fast as is needed. CBs at fullback generally look stodgy ans slow.

Dare I say that that coincided with Morgan being withdrawn. The fact was that with Ward-Prowse driving the team on he did not need as much possession.

What?

Yes, the probability does not mean much without the confidence limits which are probably +-37%

Puncheon showed himself a very good impact sub who was good for the odd goal so i don't understand the sneers. Fwiw the "family reasons" sounds plausible to me.

Care to elaborate? - or are you just guessing?

There is an element of our fan base that needs to pay attention to this - "Saints are buying a player who needs an arm around the shoulder when things are going bad, rather than screaming from the crowd and gripe from his team-mates." TBF - I don't expect any of the latter and am hoping for none of the former.

.. but that won't stop me posting it again anyway

He's got to keep his post count up - its in danger of dropping below 200 a day.

Just write to NC and demand that you be kept informed.

Yes - I cannot be bothered registering for something that I will view only once. Any chance of posting it on here Liam?

We'd have said that about Shaw last year

That's an incredibly dogmatic statement. I think that it is a lot less clear cut than that. It was with us that his career really took off and I don't think that he would s**t on us.

I imagine that it is because the sports journalists don't talk to the rest!

I am rapidly coming to the conclusion that anyone who puts up more that 5 posts on a thread should be banned for being a tedious .

Provided that the numbers have been reliably collected they cannot be argued with. However their meaning might be less clear. Their principle value is in providing some sort of objective support in an argument about the qualities of a player.

Nor me

Good call!

Yes - these rumours were so rife that this is the first that I have heard of them. You must be getting even more desperate for attention.

Games are played on grass!