You talk some unmitigated ******** at times but you are surpassing yourself tonight. Ramirez was one our best players today and he was clearly injured when he went off. But of course you could not possibly be wrong.
The popularity or otherwise of your opinion isn't the relevant issue. It is whether it is correct or not. For myself I cannot see any particular reason to suppose he is leaving. I have no doubt that there is some hard negotiating going on but I am perhaps more optimistic than you as to the outcome.
Sorry but posts 8 & 12 prove nothing. That table is a heap of statistically meaningless crap. Other posters have explained why more succinctly than I could.
If they don't then they should. You only really only appreciate the good times when you remember how bad things were and could be again. It is reminder that losing to a top level team is not the end of the world any more than being in league 1 was the end of the world. If you don't remember what things were like in league one then you turn into the kind of @rsehole fan who thinks that what they have is some sort of right.
He could have replied the way he did for any number of reasons. I think its because he wanted to ensure that there would be (eventually) a multi-page thread on here trying to second guess on what he said.
So standing in seated areas is much safer is it? Do us favour. Take a look at the safe standing arrangement then explain to us in detail just how it is more dangerous than sitting.
PS I prefer to sit but there should be a choice.
It is much safer than standing in seated areas which happens whether people like it or not. The arguments against safe standing are emotional - not logical.
That is exactly the sort of comment that was made when Walcott and Oxlade-Chamberlain were sold for big bucks. Were Arsenal wrong?
PS No way should we sell Chambers