St_Tel49

I was wondering that too. I think that he attacked the wrong poster. He should have made his comments to the person you had replied to.

I was wondering that too. I think that he attacked the wrong poster. He should have made his comments to the person you had replied to.

Nifty evasion of the question

The natural comparison would be Stones v VVD since they play in the same position. Man City bought Stones on his potential and because he is British but, at the moment I would not have him ahead of VVD. TBH I don't care that much about neutrals and Pundits. The latter talk as much ******** as people on here and the former go with what keeps getting repeated on TV.

indeed. Players at other clubs are always better than ours.

And so he should at the money he is being paid!

These things are always a matter of opinion of course but, based on last night's performances, do you really think that Stones is better than VVD or Cahill better than Fonte. In truth there is little in it - Stones has potential but at the moment that is all it is - potential. Re the Fullbacks - probably Walker for right back although a fit Clyne runs him close, but I think that Bertrand has a better all round game than Rose. Sturridge and Walcott were very poor last night. The former was never where he should have been and when he was in the right place he chose the wrong options. Walcott was totally anonymous. I am not sure why you think Dier is a better player than Romeu who is improving rapidly in the Wanyama role. Dier is a good player but i am not remotely convinced he is better that OR. You accuse some posters of wearing R&W specs and over-rating Saints players - true - but I think that you may be guilty of over-rating opposition players. However, Hart, on last night's performance is getting his confidence back and is ahead of Fraser. Hart Walker Font VVD Bertrand Romeu Henderson Rashford Ali Tadic Striker I am struggling with since the selected ones were so poor but I am not convinced ours are better

But the on-going costs are eye watering!

I very much doubt that SD will break his heart over your opinion of him. Neither will I.

Seriously- yes you can. It doesn't matter who the opposition was there is no doubt that the 4th goal demonstrated his cleverness on the ball in setting up Kyle Laverty for a simple finish. Like Malta, San Merino defended like trojans until they tired. NI had similar problems against them as England had against Malta

!

My reference to corruption was in response to Give it to Ron's comment "Shock horror football is corrupt." as though we all know this and should just live with it. At least that is how I interpret his comment.

I am not sure I believe this post. Do you think that corruption is acceptable? The fault lies 100% with BFS. He did not have to meet these people in the first place. He just got greedy.

It was not a dig at your post especially - more the fact that at the end of each of the games we have won there have been comments about how poor the opposition were. I cannot help but feel that our performances might have had something to do with that. But I do agree - West Ham were poor today and we helped to keep them that way.

It's funny how all the teams we have beaten were crap!

Yeah - Koeman, Puel and their coaching teams clearly know nothing . As it happens I thought that he had a mixed game today with one or two misplaced passes in dangerous location but he mostly played quite well including one shot which was actually on target, in contrast with the rest, and one peach of a through pass for Long

I don't think that Charlie has any real critics. Puel is being criticised for not starting with him whereas, IMHO, Puel did exactly the right thing in bring him on against a tiring team where his relative lack of peak fitness is less exposed.

I broadly agree but I would have been mighty ****ed off if that penalty had.been given against us.

We keep getting this drip, drip and yet more drip on about Wanyama and Mane. What would you have done to make them stay - throw **** loads of money at them? They had decided to go - stop harping on about them. Re Koeman - only time will tell but there is an awful lot of presumption in your post.

Perhaps, but the Meh comments are rather pointless. It is a commonsense signing.

Five words only didn't last

1. We had little choice 2. You are hard to impress 3. Agreed 4. We've done it successfully up until now - a bit soon to be worrying is it not?. It WAS United 5. Still promulgating that old ********? 6. What the hell has that to do with anything? 7. If the lots who lose interest's support is that flakey they can p1ss right off now and good riddance.

It won't be in this weekend's programme. That is a single programme for both the Espanyol and Bilbao games

Well - make up your mind

You are joking aren't you? Redmond gave their right back the runaround all game and showed real tight control when running with the ball. A good acquisition in my opinion.