PaulGilchrist_76

Not much evidence for that theory based on all the recent cock ups.

Yes, absolutely right though wasn't I?

When I suggested that Gazza wasn't the real deal after seeing him play in the summer I believe you labelled me a 'pillock'. I look forward to reading your apology and those of Bearsy, Appy et al.

January shopping list already includes 1. Goalkeeper. 2. Left back. 3. CB.

Tick Tock - moment of truth approaching..........

A couple more championship players and a young lad on loan. Goodnight Vienna!

No, I'd rather we played like we did today

Adkins said we would sign players before the City game. We didn't. Still, its not as thought the season has started yet, is it?

QPR want Dawson according to the Times. More likely he would wish to remain in London.

If the President now says the fee is not enough, who were we negotiating with originally, the groundsman?

This forum has moderators?

Pot. Kettle. Black.

Quite possibly, but these expectations have been fuelled by none other than Cortese himself. Should we have disbelieved him? I would have to agree with the majority view that our failure to secure a quality CB by now does seem really odd and I can only assume we have had a lot of bad luck. I think it was Pilchards who said that a player was given 5 days to consider his decision to join the club and a further 5 day tour of Southampton. If this is true, this gives the player a long time in which to change his mind! I think it was better in the olden days when a Cloughie or McMenemy would lock a player in the office until he signed up! These days I suppose you would have to lock up the player's agent and advisors as well! In any event, our tranfer policy will ultimately be judged by where we finish in the coming season.

Adkins + Cortese = lots of talk about being ambitious, new stadium, European football etc. Actuality = signing some lower league and SPL players.

No money spent until the new owners are in place? New manager to have his own transfer targets?