saintwarwick

Didn't realise we were playing West Ham in all 5 games

2 games? Only lost one in nine I thought

This, want to see them suffer but not disappear completely.

Who would you nominate in his place? Not suggesting he will win it or deserves to win it but he is a pretty good tennis player and I'm sure you wouldn't mind being in his shoes given his titles and assets.

Cavendish, Farah or Mcilroy for me, the top three anyway with Cavendish nicking it IMO. SaintSparky, the press follow Cavendish quite a bit as well as the golfers

Your username is a good description of him nowadays

Ole Einer Bjorndalen, the greatest ever biathlete and probably one of the greatest athletes of all time.

Whist spain played quite well and had alot of possession they didn't create a lot of chances and as they say it's the result that counts and we won 1-0. Still lets not get facts in the way of speculation.

Glad you wasn't suicidal then otherwise some old alpine threads (or some not so old) wouldn't help your cause.

A win is a win no matter how you win it and that goes for any team including saints, we have won games where we have mugged the opposition just as much as we have lost games through being mugged. One day you will wake up and actually be happy for a change and maybe praise positive results

Yep a team we had previously failed to beat in 43 years and this, 3 days after beating the current european and world champions, had we lost either game I'm sure england would of been chastised by the same people who are bemoaning the fact that we actually won both games whether they mean anything or not.

Only ever been main 2 not 3, thew Lib dems have only ever been a fringe player

This. Everybody stopped except De Ridder and the goalie made a half hearted attempt to save like on auto pilot but everybody else had stopped and some had already surrounded the ref.

So what are you suggesting, that you have to be near the foot of the table to win the award

Today

After seeing West Ham last night I see no reason why they should win it, previusly undefeated away they come up against better opposiion and as for their resources I thought they were in debt but pease correct me if I am wrong.

All teams will have the same problem though and will rely on the availability of their best players throughout the season, we will all lose some of these at some point and haven't we just got through two very hard games still playing well and being the better of the opposition without our best player, Lallana?

But the STH's have already paid for that seat so should be included whether they turn up or not and as for the other "empty" seats, you know for fact they were not sold? Could be they were sold but like the season ticket holders they could not attend for one reason or another.

So without our 100% home record we would not be heading the league, I suppose the same could be said about west ham, without their good away record they would not be second.

Think you'll find that post, like the rest are alleged quotes, and you used the word "apparently" which is not conclusive is it.

Will be interesting to see how their defence stands up against our ability to score goals in abundance.

So I have just trolled through 3 pages of why AP got the shove and I am still none the wiser

So the other 51 non slam titles he has won mean nothing to him then, seems pointless playing if you have no intention of winning

I can never decide so both for me

And they had every right in the book to defend themselves but were man enough to listen to others