Greenridge

We didn't have many left to sell if you hadn't noticed as they've been moved on already. Other than KD it seems the only players left from last years under-performing team that appear to not be in favour are BWP, Euell and Skacel. None of which are featuring and it is therefore reasonable to beleive that SFC are trying their very best to move them on. You can't sell something if there are no buyers. Skacel seems to be a prime example. SFC tried their best to shift him to Ipswich who offered him 6K per week (if we are to beleive the information coming out) whereas he's on 12K+ (again if we are to beleive what we hear). Hardly surprising he wouldn't go eh. Don't forgot the loan window opens in a weeks time.

According to SSN Everton are signing Carlo Nash as cover for Howard so that may put any move for KD out the window.

I take it that 'loans' can still be conducted outside of the transfer window or have I got that completely wrong? I think that's how it worked last season. If that's the case we might not necessarily see Euell and Skacel out the door today but perhaps over the coming weeks.

Like 'Kelvin - hopefully he is proving some off you nobs a lesson.' ??

I'm sure NickG will realise he was a little hasty in generating this thread. Our form can only be assessed over a longer period than a few games and the knee-jerk reaction that is shown for both good and poor performances in this short period is exactly that - a knee-jerk. It does however give an indication of where we are and it's not where we'd want to be that's for sure.

It's what football fans do, we are not unique at SFC in that respect. I stick by what I said and that is we have a long tough season ahead. Staying up is our goal and as long as that is met we'll have done ok. We can then take stock and continue the (re)building process.

It's a good job you are not your Lord and Master's accountant. 2 + 2 = 5 Feel free to carry on trolling.... Difficult to see past the like of Ron Davies, Terry Paine, Mick Channon and MLT for me. Beattie did his bit but to include him in the 'greatest' alongside the above? Sorry, not for me.

''....this club almost was relegated....'' And maybe you need some first grade writing tuition. You can get back in your box now.

Your lack of knowledge of anything to do with football is somewhat comical.

Have I missed something? Another load of twaddle from Mr Twaddle himself.

Pedg I have no intention in entering a debate relating to specifics on who is and who isn't a 'lowe-luvie'. Bear in mind this is not a phrase I coined or condone and certainly not one I have 'spec'd'. The point I was trying to make, and this is my last comment on the matter, is that reasonable people will take on board the facts in hand and make a balanced judgement as they see fit. Some, however, will insist in ramming biased opinion down your throat irrespective of the evidence which can be contrary to their argument. This is where I feel much of the ill-feeling is generated.

In that case Bloop I wouldn't class you as a luvvie but someone who believes in something and supports it where credit is due. Not that we should be trying to pigeon-hole fans anyway. There are some however, who would support him regardless of what he did and it's these people with a strangely slanted view of their Messiah that seem to get people's backs up. He's done some very good things for the Club and some which are not so good but to blindly believe everything he touches turns to gold is not reality.

I guess you don't read the forum too much if you think Scooby is the only one. Plenty more can be added but that's hardly the point I was making. How about Sunny D for starters. There are others of course....

I'm sorry Prof but I strongly disagree with this comment and submit a prime, if not extreme example, of Scooby. As was mentioned by someone earlier this week it is not that the majority are anti-Lowe but they do object to getting pro-Lowe comments rammed down their throats at every opportunity. It is this aspect which appears to keep the 'divide' ongoing. Nickh offered a definition of 'Lowe-Luvie' on a thread recently. However whilst I agree with some of what he wrote, in my humble opinion, a Lowe-luvie (I hate that description) is not someone who see's the good in what Lowe is doing (I think the majority would agree he is doing some very good things for the Club, albeit by necessity rather than choice) but the bloody-mindedness of some who will support him and would continue to support his ideas if he became an axe-wielding murderer. A surreal example I grant you but you get my drift.

No not at all but feel free to carry on with your patronising.

So you've not seen them play? Not very strong grounds for making this post.

Yes I knew that Nick (h) so no confusion on my part. Just read your post on the 'Lowe vindicated' thread and mybe at last we agree on something. Onwards and upwards.

Dear oh dear Nick. If it makes you feel better and massages your ego then you have been proven to be totally right. Oops, hold on a minute we've won one league game in three. I really, really hope you are right and I'm sure that goes for every single fan of SFC but it's probably a tad early to be saying 'I told you so'.

I'm sure the mod team will be grateful for your enlightenment on how to run the forum. Bit of a waste of one of your three posts but good to see you back. It must be the ray of light of a couple of successes that's brought you out of hiding.

Andy you are wasting your time trying to debate with some members of this forum who have agenda's relating only to the incumbents in the board room and not to do with objective and unbiassed assesment of footballing matters.

You continue to make such ridiculous statements with your hellbent myopic view it is scary. If Le Tiss had been in that team the results wouldn't have changed either as any sane man can tell that one player isn't a team. So from your logic you wouldn't have minded if Le Tiss had moved on. If you can't post objectively to my comments then please refrain from posting at all.

Not sure what you're trying to say with this post Proff as it appears to come under the heading of 'stating the blooming obvious'. As has been proven this week with the sale of Davies, everyone at the club is for sale irrespective of your position within the team i.e. first choice or last choice. They've attempted to dress various sales up in different ways (too old, doesn't fit the new system, wanted a new challenge, stopping the youngsters coming through, unsettled by an offer, blah blah) but you cannot dress the Davies sale up as anything other than financial. I hope this one doesn't come back to bite us right where it hurts especially considering Svensson's longevity concerns.

Not too many replies to your latest twaddle eh Scooby. I guess that just goes to show how many have you on ignore. Great win, great result. 1 out of 3 does not mean vindication whichever way you try and massage the statistics. PS ... there is a thread on exactly the same theme already running so there is no need for this duplication. I'm sure the mod team will take the appropriate action.

Couldn't agree more. Quite easily the most incredulous and short sighted decision this club has yet to make. Cue the financial wizards with the predictable retorts....

Confirmed on the OS.