aberdare

One place above us?

Perhaps harder still to believe that anyone with coaching knowledge would stand on a terrace bellowing instructions at a professional match (however poorly they are playing), and as for your son, is it not you drawing attention to the poor kid with your behaviour?

Which group? All you are naming are the partners of the accountancy practice in Cleckheaton who set the companies up. Ambercrombie Fitch & Wild for one has absolutely no connection whatsoever with Ambercrombie and Fitch. So we have Cleckheaton accountants who deal with company formations amd with board roles, and one of the partners is on the board of one company which is successful, which you don't name. Quality.

A firm of accountants in Cleckheaton doesn't shout obvious good news.... I doubt many international businesses conduct their bsiness through there...

that is the address of some accountants called Greenwood, Barton & Co

http://wck2.companieshouse.gov.uk/a2630b635a8016c768f2b24dfdc4a8c4/compdetails Don't get too excited, shell company, incorporated 1st April, by a chartered accountant practice in Cleckheaton Yorkshire called Greenwood, Barton & Co

+1 Perfectly summed up

Managed it subtly with a minute to spare

At least one club has gone bust most decades. The FL response is not going to change because otherwise Saints will go bust. Complete delusion.

IF the swiss bid is being in any way orchestrated by Ramon Vega, and I would think that a decent each way bet, his previous attempts to buy clubs including the "neighbours" have all revolved round absolutely nothing up front (the literal quid) but the consideration to be paid over a significant period of time from trading and transfers. Whilst on paper that would suggest Fry can tell the creditors they are getting x in the £, it may well be that a smaller number paid instantly is equally or more attractive to the creditors.

Unless Pinnacle suggested to the Administrator they would pay more money and claimed they could prove it, in which case Fry would be pretty much duty bound to have a look at it.

If the grounds for appeal were that SFC and SLH were entirely separate entities (something I would suggest Stevie Wonder could see they aren't), would not the administrator of SLH appealing on behalf of SFC rather lose the case before it even started?

Very VERY clearly stated in the FL regulations as being made within 7 days of the penalty being imposed....... There was a right to appeal, no one did so. [doh point made previously by others]

No offence taken, but not for about 17 years...... I wonder how many others here can say the same?

Fair call. Very few, but most would find the cash were land in the Staplewood vicinity became available at a relative discount. Check out the old BAT ground at Totton? SMS one could argue is driven more by what Aviva can get past their shareholders without anyone falling on their sword as a consequence. I would be surprised if that was less than perhaps 30-40p in the pound. The potential lack of alternative use might be a hindrance. If SFC is being sold purely as a football club in league one with -10 points and half a team, I would find any suggestion of 14m as deluded. That 14m surely has it's basis in the cost of settling Aviva and not being seen to pay under the odds for Staplewood, however it is dressed up as a football deal.