FMPR

That only works if they win the appeal, chances are we will come out of admin without a CVA pay 5p total in the pound and the taxman loses even more and we have no further liabilities. Yes we will be hit with a deduction but we can get a new (old) owner in place but we will get the embargo lifted

Actually been out and dont spend my life on here funny that. A correction which I did meant to write was Top flight and Championship but glad to have kept you amused. Remind me again what % of games Lambert has played at either of those two levels please?

Nugent and Smith upfront every day of the week. Theres a reason why they have played top flight nearly their entire career

Still more well known than the mighty league one legend that is Lambert.

Stewart is not on contract just trial. O'Brien is the only contracted keeper we have

We will be allowed to sign a GK, league rules allow for that

If you got Zuculini I would be astounded

Huddersfield

Even more so if he did, your not in for him are you?

Jordan Rhodes for me

The smaller clubs like yourselves have to wait till the big clubs have signed who they want so you can have the dergs

I thinks it fine, could do with a bit more blue to replace the red mind and probably a change in the banner too

That would be a Kanu charity game would it not?

1. Faraj took over Fahim's "purchase" of the club and this involved us paying £32m to Gayadamak which we defaulted on 2. Because he lent us £5m

You say that Phil but lets say we had £130m as debt. £32m for Gaydamak £5m for Fahim £14m for Chainrai This debt accrued from September onwards So before the whole Faraj/Fahim/Chainrai saga our debt according to AA would have been £79m. Yes still not good. How much did we get from palyer sales from the 2008 FA Cup squad? Nigh on £100m. Like you Pompey fans want to know where the money has gone as well. Phil you say your losses before admin were apporaching £12m, correct? That is 4 years worth of TV money in the Championship roughly. £79m is 2 years worth of Prem money.

Who knows (and shouldnt you be doing some work), but we were told those players were being sold to get us back on an even keel

What did we do? Sold Glen Johnson, Lassana Diarra, Jermain Defoe, Peter Crouch, Sulley Muntari, Sylvain Distin, Asmir Begovic for one

Gaydamak went on Quay Radio before the FA Cup Final in 2008 and said none of the debt was against PFC it was all against him. What he didnt say however was his personal loans to the club were against us

And funnily enough Gaydamak told us he was doing exactly that. Just like your being told as well

I do Sylvia but how come then Pompey have had a record bigger attendance? Or is that just something you wish to ignore to. The real truth is until both clubs have similar size stadiums the truth on who is better supported will come to light

Did you figure that out just because you have a bigger stadium?

HMRC, who oppose the Company Voluntary Arrangement (CVA) which will see non football creditors receive only 20p for every pound they are owed, are not backing down. They have 28 days to appeal but it is understood they are keen to avoid a court fight against Portsmouth's administrators. HMRC said in a statement: "HMRC notes that the result of today's vote was to accept the CVA proposals. We will now be carefully considering our position. "HMRC stands by the full amount of its claim. We will now carefully consider our position following chairman's decision to reduce the amount of our claim for voting purposes." HMRC are challenging the Premier League and Football League's rule that 'football creditors' get priority in having their debts paid off first and in full. The statement added: "HMRC believes the so called "football creditors rule" is unfair, unlawful and unacceptable. "It cannot be right for millions of pounds worth of assets and income of Portsmouth FC to be earmarked for payment of football debts in full while other creditors - including the public purse - have been offered a mere 20p in the pound over five years." Andrew Andronikou, the man appointed by an insolvency court to be Pompey's administrator, only gave HMRC voting rights for £24million debt rather than £37million, in effect preventing them from blocking the CVA vote which needed 75% of creditors in favour. He claims the other money relates to image rights and should be not be considered part of the club's debts.

Well on the day of voting for go ahead for a CVA (the meeting a month ago) the HMRC just happens to find that we owe alot more money. So are they incompetent to have just found that money or just doing it to gain a veto. I know people here will claim they are whiter than white right now though

Only as much as HMRC adjusted the value of their claim