Red_No_7

**** sake, why do people keep on about him not putting his cash into it? HE IS A CHAIRMAN OF A FOOTBALL CLUB, NOT AN OUTRIGHT OWNER. how many chairman put their own money into any business? i could understand if he owned say 60%, but there's no way he'll put anything in to a company that is 90% owned by other people, and nor would i and nor would any of us, lets be honest...

here's joe's inspiration:D http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=J4x05Z3MSkQ mike bassett

cracking post. last bit needs to be drummed into some peoples head, just as the point the money they spend DOES NOT go directly to lowe. lets face it even with 30k goiing every week, does not guarantee going up, but it keeps a young entertaining side together, which is important.

jeez. lowe doesn't take the money home and pay it in his personal account in the morning:rolleyes: if "fans" continue to stay away the club are going to have to either a) sell some good youngsters to survive or b) sell some good youngsters and eventually go into admin as the kids comin through dry up. the club need as many fans in what is a decisive time or even darkest hour. true, but there's plenty that go to neither too, and say the "not going while lowe's there" to sound like a "top red(and white)"

but you did forget that most of manchester still support united and not city as the media would love you to believe...

apparently this is the div http://www.kuvalauta.fi/b/src/122215887655.jpg

dersim, above bar. end of thread

dave jones did though,bring him back:rolleyes: jeez, its a almost a whole new squad, playing good football, and they're kids ffs. 6/7 games and people expect them to be world beaters already, wept.

i think i know what you're on about but can't see it on the echo site, though it was (i think) front page about 2 years ago...