saintant

You must be listening to different players to me because, to a man, every one I've heard comment has said what you could gain is miniscule.

Bingo!

Yeah, that's hardly a watertight way of doing things.

Don't be daft, a random bloke from the pub wouldn't have known what he was doing.

Oh please. You're taking the view of the EFL and journalists at the time now.

Yeah, I think Pannick's appearance at the appeal was his warm up act just to get him in the game so to speak. Like a coiled spring, at Dragan's say-so, he's about to come out swinging with both fists. You wouldn't want to get in the way of that unless your case is more watertight than a duck's ass.

Nah, you're not allowed to even attempt to fight our corner according to some on this forum. Gibbo could come out and say he orchestrated the whole thing to give Boro two shots at the play-offs and some would congratulate him and claim he'd done no wrong (not suggesting that's what he did of course).

Well, for one neither the FA or EFL gave him any kind of suspension for what he admitted to do whilst rubbing their noses in it by explaining how he did it. Some of us just want a level playing field. Not hard to understand surely.

Yeah, Orville's feathers.

My learned friend, there remains the question of whether these two people declared their connections to Boro. The defence rests.

Assume that's rhetorical because we're talking Gibbo here 🙂

Did he declare it himself as I think he was probably obligated to do?

Tough one for them proving we'd have beaten Hull.

Ah, the original Ted Bates statue - thanks for cheering me up. The image of that never fails to make me laugh.

Next conspiracy theory, delay is due because Dragan has come over all guns blazing and appointed a top sports lawyer to look into the Boro links on the 3 person hearing committee 🙂