stu0x

Right So if I told you that I know for a fact that is nonsense, I would be lying presumably?

Octavia

Did you record the video you are placing so much stock in? Because if you didn't, then it's not your first hand experience, so why do you believe it?

He's refusing to even answer any of my questions, easier to stick your fingers in your ears and shout 'la la la' I guess

What would it take to actually convince you? Because you seem utterly unwilling to consider any evidence, however rational, and however overwhelming, that doesn't fit with your 'theory'. I mean, if I were to tell you that I know from *first hand experience* that what you are saying is nonsense, would you believe me? Or would you just dismiss me as one of the lizard people, a shadowy construct created by the security services and planted on saintsweb and its predecessors several years in advance as a sleeper with the sole purpose of pulling the wool over the eyes of the only man who knows the truth?

I'm honestly not sure I get your point. Are you saying witnesses lied? Or can you not understand how, if 50 different people see an extremely traumatic incident, they are all going to have differing (in some cases wildly differing) accounts of what happened, but that does not make them liars or covering something up, it makes them human beings? What information could have been released on the day? Do you understand that Post Mortems, even emergency ones, are not conducted immediately? Can you not understand how the most graphic injury someone suffers in an assault may not be the cause of death? Because the cause of death is what killed someone, so anything done *after* they were dead, for example, wouldn't be the cause of death. Do you understand what a PM is? Genuine questions, as you seem to be drawing conclusions and basing logic on utterly faulty premises. Like I said, I can tell you with 100% certainty that, if your argument is that this is part of some massive cover up on the basis that you've seen a video of someone who appears not to have blood on his hands, then you are deluded.

Well if you expand your search beyond the premier league then you can find other teams that have done it, most notably Barca and Ajax (repeatedly). In fact, arguably, most teams that dominate for a significant period of time have had very strong academies (or young player development systems). It raises an interesting chicken or egg quandary though. Is their academy a by-product of their dominance, or a factor of it? You could make an argument to say that a strong youth development policy has shown itself to be key to sustained success, and that without it success is likely to be fleeting and extremely cost-ineffective. Of course engaging in that discussion would need much more open-minded humility and much less supercilious sneering. So probably not going to happen.

I can tell you with one hundred percent certainty that you are a deluded fool. And I don't need a dodgy YouTube video to 'prove' it.

Easy Nails

Look on the bright side, if he does go, Pulis is available...

I'd have thought that both Deschamps and Schneiderlin would know that the french word for 'France' is... 'France'.

If its a proper company car (and not a PCP or similar), then just choose it based on whichever will incur the smallest tax bill. The attraction of driving anything particularly Gucci soon wears off when you're doing the miles for business reasons.

Just use the built in stuff like Defender, and make sure you have Hijackthis installed and ready to go should you run into issues. Beyond that, I find the security 'suites' like Norton cause more problems than they solve, getting their grubby little fingers into everything you do, invariably running a dozen processes in the background and slowing everything to a crawl. If you've got the basics and employ a modicum of common sense (ie you know when it says "CLICK HERE FOR FREE PORN!!!"? Well, don't) you'll avoid the vast majority of infections, and any you do get can be swiftly euthanised with a combination of Safe Mode and HJT

Pretty much covers it, really.

Don't bother with an old C-Max, they're rubbish, arguably less usable space than a Focus. We almost got a C4 Grand Picasso, liked it a lot and good value. Other obvious options are S-Max, Mazda 5... might need to stretch the budget a little though. If you're stuck with that budget, you could do worse than a Zafira. Why the Donkey, incidentally? Theyre not very good... do you already have a Chameleon?

Once again... Buy-and-loan-backs within the Premier League are no longer allowed, due to a rule change about 5 years ago. So, every time you read a story suggesting this as an option, you know it's a load of made up nonsense by an ill-informed journo.

Patently untrue. Publishing (only) the fact that someone has been arrested for an offence can never be defamatory, provided it is true of course. The fact that it creates an inference of guilt *in the mind of the public*, as can be seen by the rest of this thread, is an irrelevance, as this inference is driven by a lack of understanding of key terms on the part of the reader, rather than any intent to deceive on the part of the author (as below). That is why attempts to confer rights of anonymity upon arrested or even charged people prior to conviction, which generally flare up whenever there's a high profile false accusation case, end up withering on the vine. Think about it. Every single time there is a public interest case (because of the nature of the crime, the identity of the victim, or the identity of the suspect), the major news organisations invariably report an arrest. How many times are they subsequently sued for libel if the person isn't charged? Almost never. The only one I can think of offhand would be the landlord in the Jo Yeates murder - and even then it was because one particular tabloid rag blatantly overstepped the mark and all but said that he had actually done it. All the other media outlets reporting the same arrest (and the extended detention), but in a more responsible manner, were not actionable. You are drawing a distinction that does not exist. Everyone who is arrested is *suspected* of committing an offence, because proof occurs in court at conviction, not before. So saying that person x has been arrested for offence y is perfectly accurate (and exactly what they are told at the time of arrest), because the purpose of arrest is to further an investigation in order to prove or disprove involvement in an offence. There is a big difference between "Loic Remy has been arrested for rape" (fine) and "Loic Remy has been arrested because he raped someone" (clearly not fine - although not actionable in this instance!)

Rush goalie?

Virgin

Halifax do a 'simplicity' card that is 0% abroad, not just EU but worldwide. Just load it up with a positive balance before you go to offset any interest charges

Suddenly? No. He's been a desperately dull one-note bore for a while now.

I'm pretty sure Cocktail has more than one scene with Tom Cruise in it, that would be mental, he's on the poster And everything

Your router does two jobs simultaneously 1) it connects to the Internet via a modem 2) it creates a local network If your devices remain connected to the local network, but nothing can access the Internet, then clearly 2 is working but 1 is not, so it's not your 'wireless'. Chances are its either a line fault, or you need to upgrade the firmware on or replace the router. You need to speak to your ISP. Prepare for the runaround.

No you won't. The moon is much much closer than the stars. If you aim for the moon and miss, you'll die in a freezing vacuum.

It would do, if that had ever been his catchphrase.