farawaysaint

Quagga

A couple of like minded directors wouldn't go amiss in terms of a vote of course

The end is NIGH!!! Oh... wait

Weren't both of the goals as a result of his long throws?

This is a wee bit cynical don't you feel?

4-1 Preston i fear

This is never a good idea DOF or not...

?

To be fair we don't have that many players to watch anymore

Shock horror!

As is plainly evident if you look at the previous years AFS which shows aggregate emoluments of 579000 pounds and emoluments to the highest paid director of 226000 pounds. Maybe you shouldn't criticize until you've seen just how much the new board is being paid when the current financial statements come out Then feel free to moan

He works for the company ergo he gets paid a wage Anyone in his position would expect the same.

In short there is no benefit whatsoever for Lowe to screw up the club, he in fact returned to attempt to protect his investment, they definitely won't be getting rich out of bleeding this club dry as essentially the entire club's income belongs to the bank unless we can meet our debts.

It's not just over there

Quiet scud or I'll be forced to throw down personal insults about some trivial spelling error on a football forum

My vote is for thread closure on the basis that if the regular forum goers stop arguing their brains stop functioning

Wasn't it reported when we signed Cork that he was loaned to us because we'd play him in a CD role where Chelsea sees as his ultimate position?

Ostlund was considered "hard"

Doesn't Richards count as a youngster?

Scouting Africa for us would be fairly pointless as gaining work permits is always going to be far too difficult.

I am god and created the universe... Oh, and this webcomic is NOT the most awesome thing ever http://drmcninja.com/index.html

I'm not sure of the laws in Britain but it's usually only statutory rape if there is a difference in age of a couple of years.

I live in Africa... I win

Poe's law http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/Poe's_Law