Dibden Purlieu Saint

Clueless hardman on the loose.

I paid £65 for a ticket to the Ashes next Summer, and that is over 7 hours. So I would say about a third of that, maybe £21.

Wonder if Tajjuk still thinks Benteke is **** and would still much prefer JRod.

Just no...

Another good example of you trolling your way around the forum.

Which I did, Post 60. Not a problem.

I believed it was true. I even think assumption is the incorrect word. I believed it was true, but it turned out to not exist. Is that an assumption? I'm not sure. Someone with a better vocabulary than me could contribute to this one.

Found it: 3. Stalker troll. It takes a fairly sick mentality to want to be a troll. If you were in any way healthy, you would prefer to hang out the blogs of people you agree with, rather than maliciously setting out to disrupt those of people you hate. Stalker troll is the sickest of the lot. He becomes obsessed with every last detail of life of the person whose blog he infests, in the hope of gleaning titbits which he can use against his nemesis. For example, one of the regular trolls on this blog makes frequent sneery references to the fact that I suffer from depression. This is bizarre. The reason he knows I suffer from depression is because I have written great big articles about it in the Daily Mail and The Spectator. Presumably this means, then, that my depression is not something I consider a weakness (Winston Churchill? Stephen Fry? etc) nor something I find embarrassing. http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100099194/seven-types-of-troll-a-spotters-guide/

And I'm confused as to why you do this on every thread. What is it about your psyche that means you have to create arguments for the sake of it? I said that it was an assumption before you replied. Fair enough, if you had set out your opinion or was disagreeing with someones opinion offering your own, but you're not. I wonder why you do this?

I notice you're doing your usual, just trolling threads looking for someone to argue with. As per usual, you haven't put your opinion to the OP, just posted to try and create arguments...*sigh*

By the way, our internet at work doesn't show emoticons, so all I see is blank space!

Nice to see your following me around again though.

No, I couldn't remember what was said in another thread?! How do you do a confused emoticon?

Example?

No, I thought it had been identified in the other thread that initially discussed it, but looking through it it's an assumption.

I'm caught in 2 minds about this. On one hand being in my position I wouldget on my high horse and tell you to stop speeding. But if this happened to me, I'd fight it all the way, so I suggest you do this.

Surrey is pretty big. For example, Palace are in Surrey aren't they being in (near enough) Croydon?

Brentford maybe..? I've been to see them a couple of times (I'm North Surrey).

We'd struggle to fill a 45,000 seater in the Championship, that's for sure.

Fair enough, it is an assumption. Could be more, could be less.

You really can't say this. I would say he's unlikely to stay in my opinion as he has to have ambitions better than Saints now he is in the Premiership and other teams will come calling. Again, you really can't say this. Wolves, Blackburn etc have struggled this season. Financially, we have a £30m loan that is secured against future Season Ticket sales. There is no proof that we wouldn't have issues and I think we are more on the side of having issues IF we were to be relegated.

I do agree it would have merits yes, especially due to the Managers we'd be able to attract when in the Championship.

That's not really the point. Yeah, we'd get good money for them, but it would be pretty gutting having the majority of our starting lineup removed from us. We'd then have to build a new team, with a new Manager (he'd be sacked if we went down imo) and new tactics to learn in the toughest league in the World.

Staying up is the bare minimum this Season, and people need to realise this. One problem I see with a lot of people on this forum (the "I would prefer to go down with Adkins" crowd) is that I don't think people realise how damaging going down would be. Not only the drop in income, but the loss of our best and also favourite players. I could see us losing Lallana, Lambert, Ramirez, Schneiderlin, Clyne, Puncheon, Shaw if we go down. That, imo, would be an utter disaster after spending £30m on strengthening the side. Catastrophic.

Fans should only be located in the city of the team. These Surrey fans are utter ******s.