Whitey Grandad

That has been deleted but in any case the profile is written and maintained by the principal.

Yeah. And they never buy a round.

Thanks. I'm upright and still warm to the touch. And my PSA level is down to 0.42 after three months of hormones.

As in most walks of life, timing is everything.

Me too. My bins were emptied today instead of yesterday.

Unless any such information was not worth having* *In technology information analysts will tell you that negative information is of itself information.

But did we though? It could have been anybody. And since the security staff didn't obtain his identity there is very little evidence of any Saints involvement. Unless we admit it.

Every club does it. Including Middlesbrough.

Indeed. Disproportionate punishment.

*On a Thursday instead of a Wednesday

Exactly. How are Leeds doing these days? Nobody gives a defecation.

Then why is it there?

Exactly. And when did he actually leave us?

We call them "alleged breaches"

Nothing wrong with that if it's outside 72 hours before the match. The relevant information is how many other clubs do it.

What allegations? They only have to respond to the EFL. It is always inadvisable to respond to wild speculation in the press.

Agreed. I must admit I was highly sceptical until I saw the source.

And is also a shape- shifter.

I doubt they have that much discretion. If it's in their regulations it would take something extraordinary to overturn it. Otherwise it would have been a shorter period from the start.

This is from the Daily Mail: "Southampton sent a junior intern to allegedly spy on Middlesbrough’s training session ahead of their Championship play-off semi-final. Daily Mail Sport has learnt the identity of the employee in his early 20s who was caught in the bushes at Boro’s Rockliffe Park training ground this week. The individual at the centre of the ‘spygate’ storm has worked for Saints for nearly a year and is listed as a first-team analyst. He has worked at other Premier League clubs. His current job description includes the word ‘intern’, raising serious questions over why Southampton would instruct a junior member of staff to break EFL rules, if that was the case. The club have not commented, 24 hours on from Daily Mail Sport breaking the story of the sensational spying furore. The EFL are investigating and, if Boro’s allegations are proven, a substantial fine will likely be served as a minimum punishment. The sanction could yet be more severe, given clubs were clearly instructed not to spy on opposition training following the Leeds United spygate saga of 2019. The League introduced a new rule after Leeds were fined £200,000 when boss Marcelo Bielsa admitted to sending a colleague to snoop on Derby County’s training." There's a revealing slip in there, 'He has worked at other Premier League clubs.'

I knew they weren't his real eyes.

14 days to respond, isn't it?

Civil Offence at worst.

Nice country Canada. Can get a bit cold though.

Blame the Geneva Convention for that.