Jump to content

RobM

Members
  • Posts

    2,519
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by RobM

  1. Wiziwig tends to have the streams listed quite late on compared to FirstRowSports, but they have something every week in my experience. I tend to head straight to FirstRowSports though, the number of links they offer increases at KO and it's not hard to find a good stream. Just ignore any false-adverts telling you you don't have video and 'click here' to install some crap, just wait for the 'close' button to appear.
  2. Not only that, he's so lazy and unmotivated he hasn't bothered to take the tag off his new chair. Unacceptable.
  3. Same as every week - FirstRowSports and Wiziwig.tv Never changes. Bookmark them.
  4. I might be being a bit thick, but what's the KKK connection with Saints or todays game?
  5. Agreed. Round pegs in round holes, rather than playing people out of position.
  6. How is it? Clyne is both a RB and a LB, but predominately, Cork plays CM or RM, Richardson is a RM. All of them can, do, have and are able to play in these positions. I'm not suggesting this becomes our starting lineup, I'm suggesting it's a far more sensible option (round pegs and all that...) than playing players out of position. Yoshida is a CB through-and-through, Forren I admit I don't know enough about to say either way.
  7. No, definitely not, playing players out of position isn't the answer. Clyne can play LB if needed, so we just have to hope Shaw stays fit and keep Richardson on the bench. This lets us use Clyne as our reserve LB and Cork and Richardson as RB.
  8. We looked a different team to all other games since MP has been here. Our tight, controlled, high-tempo, passing game only made a few appearances. We didn't look bad, we looked competitive, but the strength and determination we've had of late went missing. I do wonder if the comments pre-game about having two weeks off being a bad thing are spot-on. Newcastle should, in theory, have been tired from a Thursday game and travelling, but they looked faster, fitted and harder working and ultimately that's why they won.
  9. If you assess the whole phase of play, it's not unreasonable to wonder how Fox was beaten so easily, leaving him chasing and flapping his arms in desperation. You're right, that one moment cannot be taken in isolation, but Fox should have been in control of the situation from the start. Shaw never looked so vulnerable.
  10. Stop taking it so seriously.
  11. Disagree, 1st half Lallana didn't do much. 2nd half much better and a good cross for Lamberts goal.
  12. 100% agree. And Fox is ****.
  13. You're right to a point, but Fox should have had his arms under control. That's the game these days, you can't run around flapping like a bird, you're supposed to be a professional LB.
  14. Get in!!!! 2-2 Lambert! Great time to get your 100th!
  15. Why are you talking it so seriously?
  16. It's possible to have a sensible conversation with like-minded folk about a subject you're interested in, without being a manic depressive or a trolling, egotistical *****. Try it.
  17. Feed 1 on First Row is working well. A few hiccups but decent enough. http://www.firstrow1.eu/watch/171033/1/watch-newcastle-united-vs-southampton-fc.html
  18. Agreed. At least Alpine believes what he posts and isn't around much. This clown is far, far worse. But then you have to be a bit 'special' to get that many posts on this forum!
  19. You have to be a massive cockend to write off a game as a loss in the 1st half. If a team can look up for it in the first half, the opposite can happen in the second.
  20. Jesus, I think.
  21. That article contradicts itself. It says NC is waiting for us to secure our place in the Premiership before offering JP a contract, but also says we're simply dithering - both can't be true. Either way, I think we will offer JP a new contract, the problem will be the terms of that contract. It might be that we only offer another year as we have bigger and better things in mind, but know he is a solid performer and a good option to have around. I can't imagine us offering him a really long, lucrative deal to tie him down as being honest, he isn't quite good enough to demand that. If the NC dream comes true and we become a top-five club, JP doesn't really feature.
  22. If their owners were solid and secure I think you'd be 100% right, but the fact Leeds are rumoured to be changing hands yet again must worry any manager.
  23. The club existed before NC, it exists while he is chairman and will exist after he is gone, so I'm with you on that for sure!
  24. I think people are trying to find something that isn't really there. Benali and NC are in a legal dispute, which is being handled in the right way. I've not seen Benali on Twitter calling NC out, in the press on a regular basis calling him a not very nice man, nothing like this. He has commented, but he has also kept his head down. MLT has made it very clear that he has never asked for handouts and buys his own season ticket, even though he can't often attend. He does have an ego though (he's a man) and likes to voice his opinion. He is also a clever self-publicist and knows how to keep his name in conversation. It also seems clear that his encounters with NC haven't been favourable to him - understandable when competing for a massive business deal and trying to gain an advantage, which is how this started. But to suggest he expects certain treatment from the club and this is his problem is misguided at best.
  25. In those few days there was indeed shock and outrage, followed by acceptance, then understanding, then everyone is onboard with the decision. It's pretty standard human reactions. I don't think we ever looked a terrible club though, quite the opposite. I think during the early stages NC looked a terrible chairman, possibly a terrible man. But the club was spoken highly of, Adkins and our achievements were reflected upon positively, we were being discussed as a club for all the good things we've achieved, while at the same time being told how terrible NC is. And I've never been grizzly about ex-players harming the club. I've never said whether I'm bothered about how we are perceived or not. I've never once attempted to brush your opinion aside - quite the contrary, I asked for you to expand on your opinion and explain the rationale behind it. You seem to have a chip on your shoulder and an expectation that anybody who questions your opinion is doing so for a fight or to tell you you're wrong and know nothing. Actually, I didn't understand it so wanted to know more. In truth, I think you'll struggle to find any of the press reports about Adkins dismissal calling us a terrible club.
×
×
  • Create New...