Crouchie's Lawyer

Im afraid there is no 'apparently' about it, I do live just down the road from you. And you know who I am you daft bint, your my friend on f::ckbuck! And you loved each and every second of that minute!

I dont even know half the usernames/people your accusing me of being!

People can suggest what they wish to suggest, and providing there are genuine reasons behind it, then fair enough. We dont know the in's and out's behind it all, you are right, however, it seems someone has suggested banning christmas trees as the christmas tree is traditionally linked with Christianity and as such, would offend non Christians. Regardless of what 'fuel' the Daily Mail may or may not have added to the fire, you cannot honestly say this is a sensible suggestion? For example, the FA would never say 'lets trial a square lead filled ball' would they? Its just a stupid f*cking thing to say. Its common sense. My 'beef' is with the people/person who suggested this as a serious thing to consider.

You can shut it too, you know I am none of these people! The law suit is getting bigger as these threads continue to grow! I have read that 'golden' thread on b-anter after a few references to it and it did make me laugh.

Who is Keef?

Bates, set this c*nt straight.

Isnt plastic saint Wiltshire? Again, this is not me either

Although it seems I have a similar posting style to him (I dont know him, only know of him from what I have seen on b-anter) I am not Crouchie. A few people can confirm this. Although if it makes you, Tiggs, Wiltshire etc sleep better at night, then you can think of me as Crouchie

You know what, f*ck off you muggy little c*nt. I made a relevant point and your hatred for all things Daily Mail and the like means you can't let someone get their view point across without you twisting it to see what you want to see which you then jump on with a completely pointless arguement. All I was saying is that whoever has these genius thoughts of 'lets ban or outlaw x, y or z for the benefit of 1, 2 or 3' is insane, however you jumping to the defence of these people is making me think it may have been your decision to suggest banning xmas trees! You certainly are digging in your heels sticking up for them!

So you call me a mongtard for suggesting it, then suggest it yourself? In my initial quote I said 'fish4 and the like' meaning websites where you could search online and/or upload your CV. I think he understood what I was meaning.

The press may fan the flames yes, but it was said by someone in the first place for them to get hold of it. Albeit shot down or refused striaght away, my point is, what the hell was going through the minds of the person/persons who said it initially? Did they not engage their brains before speaking?

I think the issue is that they want to live their lives normally and (and I would be hazarding a guess here) white 'know it all's' in the local government or business are obviously trying to score points on the ethical front by suggesting these absurd rules. This brings it to the attention of the Daily Mail and like and consequently fuels a lot of hate mongering towards the ethnic minorities. I think given the choice, they would say it actually offends them more when it is suggested than when it isnt! But yes, saying it 'may' offend someone else or a certain 'group' of people does offend me. How about the person/people it is allegedly going to offend give their view? If the majority of them (or even a significant minority) are offended, then by all means bring in a law which will not offend them.

Twaddle on ducky, you post your fair share of it too! xxx

This is what I wish to know

Bates, how many times do I need to tell you, making your cups of tea and wiping your bum when you go to the loo is not labouring! On a serious note though Rich, have you tried fish4 and the like?

Ahhh, did you lose your job because S.C.C didnt want to offend Muslims?

Toilet paper Propping up a wonky chair Fire paper (Stuff you light and put under the logs in a real fire) When rolled up, can be used as a fly squatter / weapon

Regardless of if they get passed or not, the pure suggestion of these 'laws' or rules should never happen. So, there are still xmas tree's in west quay, right, but which c*nt came up with the suggestion (implemented or not) to remove them as to not offend? The Daily Mail may blow things out of proportion with their reporting and exagerate things a lot, but there is an initial plonker who says/does something which merits a story being wrote about it!

Thats very lolable. Very funny how he dragged it out with the 7 legs! :smt042

Hmmm, Nottingham Forest are no Manchester United. Traditionally, the week before xmas has not been a 'bumper' week for Home attendances either and with the credit crunch still very much in place, I would be surprised if we made 20k for this fixture. Very surprised. Fair play to the club for doing this though, but I think its come a little too late.

He should be blamed IMO aswell, failing to notice a kid has a broken back! Understandably a bit cranky, and IMO all the more reason he should have looked at the kid.

I have the best clunge FACT

They do have some crazily cheap offers on at the moment TBF

:smt042 You messed up admit it! Anyway, on a slightly different note, I think I must be built upside down. My Feet smell and my nose runs! (For the record ladies - I wouldnt want to spoil your prefect visions of me, my feet do not smell!)

Anyway, before reading the thread, I thought Hatch was on a 'Infraction' mission :shock: