Guan 2.0

The man who reads between the lies to see the truth spouts the biggest lie of all. Anybody with half a brain knows this to be a lie http://www.thesaintshub.com/marcelotejera.html about a very dodgy transfer , and anybody with the memory or will to remember will know that Redknapp was persuing over the summer Clinton Morrison (£500,000) who said in the press he would only move to a london club near his home, and Robbie Blake (300,000) who wanted a move in the north or midlands. Because of his laziness in looking for targets (which summed up his time here), we ended up with fuller via Mckay, and Tajera via Mcmenemy junior. Except that didn't happen, because you told us so and we're all mugs. I don't quite know what you get out of spamming the threads with your attempt at revisionist nonsense.

It isn't untenable, but for some reason, there are posters on here who would like to give the impression that it is. Once the polls on here and in the echo made it clear that NA was still the favoured man, and new tactic emerges where certain posters commit hundreds of posts to the same subject over multiple threads, twisting quotes, extrapolating from rumoured gossip to make unsubstantiated 'facts' and for whatever reason, stifle true debate and instead paint a picture of 'SFC in crisis'. It is very odd.

I wonder what part of Redknapps previous tenure here convinces certain posters of his suitability now? I can think of these positives:

17th and a cup run was always good enough for me in our first season back. Others may have wanted more, but that's enough for me. Depending on how we play the rest of the season, I might even keep Adkins if we go down. Mcmenenemy relegated us before promotion and the cup win. We've been spoilt by a manager who earned his shot, and has worked his way up through the non-leagues. He has delivered back to back promotions over two seasons at the first time of asking. He has us playing attractive football (if somewhat open). Yet some on here want him sacked after 8 games. 8. What a ****ing joke. Do people think that is truly a 'fair crack of the whip'. Who should we appoint? Steve Bruce? Mick Mcarthy? Harry dickhead Redknapp (The amnesiacs and Tvvats favourite. Little clue, he was a bungy manager then who didn't give a sh1t, nothing has changed now). Oh and just because the same posters make 100 different threads on the same subject, does not mean the 'silent majority' want him gone. It just means you're making a circle jerking 'echo chamber' of "sack the manager" that nigh on 70% (comfortably over 2/3) of users who want Adkins to stay on here can't be bothered to get into, beacause you'll just bore them to death by spamming the threads.

LOL check before you post example #1

Someone then said to Matt that there wouldn't be a Southampton FC without Cortese, to which he replied:he trai Are Cortese taking down the picture of train from doncaster? For shame.

Marcelo Tajera When we had no money, good old 'arry wasted 100,000 on a player he would never pick, and was available on a free transfer (Mcmenemy's son was the agent). Harry is a Saint A major South American club has admitted to The Independent that it received £100,000 from Southampton for a player who was actually available for nothing, in a transfer that has been reported to the Premier League's ongoing "bungs" inquiry as "suspicious". So ****ing dodgy and wasteful, at a time we had so little.

Let's dig him up and ask him, shall we?

They badmouth him in the press? They jumped in the bath and made the bubbles laugh? Who knows?

I'm just hoping that Matt is silently sitting in his chair on saturday with a look of mirth on his face as once more, Jeff Stelling launches an attack against Cortese on his behalf, including: Peeing with the door open Not holding a lift Being a bad man Those are always good. "Now then, now then, let me tell you about a very bad man" Seriously, if he has something worthwhile to say, he should just say it. If he is hiding behind the shield of 'not wanting to damage the Cortese/ the club/ whatever' that is nonsense, as every negative report gives off a bad impression, so at least give it substance if you are going to criticise, and not just continue to insinuate that Cortsese is an Alien from They Live. "Be sure to eat the program sellers after firing them"

this. Out loud (just to be clear, the comment, not monkey chants).

Just annoys me when the uninformed use that as a headline for reason he should be Prime Minister. And he tries to take credit for it too! Almost as bad as the "He's a legend for the tackle in the Germany game, Boris for PM" crew. It makes you wonder how far John Major would have gone as PM with a bit of charisma. Or at least if he hadn't wasted all of his 'charms' on Currie.

Nice to see them using Ken Livingstone bikes.

Ha, what a ****ing tool. Moment of conception I think you'll find, not moment of contraception. As a man, you'll never have to go through it, but most importantly, the reason we use scientific language in such matters rather than emotional and 'belief' based language is that it is based on scientific processes and judgements. A quick question for the poster and anyone who think along similar lines as above. If women continue to have abortions along current guidlines, which of the following will happen? A) Women will have abortions, and it won't affect you. B) Sharks will develop into bipedal land breathing deadly fish, and eat us for our inhumanity. C) Anyone who has had an abortion or supported a womens right to one, will be sent to Nazi hell with the and only the above posters and J. Hunt will surviving. Mods, can we have a poll please?

Shuttup you, it's obviously so Clotese can build a snack creche were he can eat babies, looser floorboards so he can stash the BVI gold, and a monkey-chicken petting zoo, of course.

So true, you only have to read back over to see stuff like "this will be in the nationals tomorrow" The result? Sweet FA in the press. Just because some on here are a bunch of squinnying ****s, they presume everyone else must be. Last year, Nicola Clotese (LOL) claimed he was 43, this year he says he's 44. Which is it Nikki? Best get your story straight. #Don'tswallowSFClies

Does anybody else else think we should have bought a LB (left back ) in the summer? I've just started thinking this, and haven't been able to find anyone else who feels this way on the post match threads thus far this season.

Ha, what a **** name.

Didn't Saints have some guy called Higgins back in the day, who was overly fond of the children in his charge?

Yeah, it's just like North Korea or Cuba over here. And it's still not worth hundreds of thousands of pounds of our money just to give the Police a rap on the knuckles.

Note that I only highlighted the amount in my post. I agree it was wrong, but I think £250 per man would have been appropriate. I don't see how depriving the taxpayer (you know, the people who fund the police) of just shy of £200,000 in the current economic climate, because a few peeps who couldn't go an afternoon without a drink missed watching their rugby team hoof it at the Ethiad, is a 'brilliant result'.

Wow. How is that a good thing?

"My dear sir, I quite agree", said Stephen, putting down his coffee. O'Brian gives us a full story, Forester 'saves' us by looking the other way

Reading the quotes from POL reminds me of the delusions of 'El Supremo' in C.S. Forester's 'The Happy Return' (well worth a read, btw).