Jump to content

Suhari

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    6,887
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Suhari

  1. Works hard, looks like a leader on the pitch, hard to play against, scores goals. And still 23 I think. C'mon Les. Do the right thing.
  2. Shelvey available apparantly, with Palace sniffing round. £10M. Now he would be an excellent signing for us.
  3. How credible is that site? If true..replacement for Mane or alternative to Davis?
  4. Delay decision on his own future I imagine? 18 months left, no commitment to extended, and **** results. The board should be asking themselves how to move forward.
  5. **** me. That is one hellof a statement from a genuine ITK, whose views are hugely resected by the old(er) school posters on here. Care to elaborate?
  6. We need to spend some ££ and sign his replacement early in the window. Then play hard ball with Man U if they want him this window; if they don't stump up, let him sit in the reserves and on the bench until the summer.
  7. Stek - good loan signing. Can't think of someone we could of got who'd be better cover. VVD - good signing. Has had a couple of dodgy moments, but is moree than good enough for a top 8 team. Cedric - bought as the backup/emerging RB i believe; he looks the part for me. Decision made to make him first choice when our main RB target (anyone know who it was btw?) became unavailable. Very poor decision by the club. Martina - seems to be here to make up the numbers for the Europa campaign. Very poor signing. Caulker - cover for the injured Gardos. Though he'd be better than he is. Is what it is; scraping the barrel for cover. Romeu - like him. Wish he was given a proper run in order to find his feet. Decent signing. Claise - good player. Good piece of business; shame he's been injured which has clearly impacted him. Juanmi - don't get this signing at all. We needed a goal scoring midfielder/option other than Mane or Tadic. Is this what he was signed for? Poor signing who was needleselly bigged up by Sir Les. Not a good performance from the board overall. And a worse one so far this season from Ronald.
  8. We need to get some young, hungry players in.
  9. No Juanmi. Transfer window open. 2+2=......
  10. We were so, so good first half. On another day, or perhaps with a more incisive striker, we'd have been three ahead. Second half we lost the midfield, lacked energy, and weren't flexible enough to adapt. Strong decision on the subs from RK, but ultimately not great. Gaston was very poor, Juanmi decent, but all shape lost. I admire the ambition of the changes, but Claise for Romeu should've happened. Will take the positives from the game. On to the next one.
  11. Wow. Talk about a positive change. Can't argue there isn't intent to go and win this.
  12. Ohhh. Gaston coming on!
  13. We've lost the focus in midfield. Would be tempted top bring in CLaise or JWP for Romeu - given he's on a yellow.
  14. Good performance. Should be out of sight by now.
  15. Our enforced change of style is likely to suit him more I think. Movement, through balls and runs in behind; as opposed to playing off a big fella.
  16. Very good performance. Covered a lot of ground, was tenacious and played some decent passes. He's finding his feet.
  17. Ian Wright: dressed like a ****, and moaning like one too.
  18. I was so wrong in my prediction! Happily so. One swallow does not make a summer; but that was a really good performance. Energy, movement, pressing. Moved the ball quickly. Had a shot from outside the box!!
  19. 4-0 $long. Tadic through ball. When did we last score a goal from a clever run and through ball?? Brilliant.
  20. Off the post! $long.
  21. He did. Came mostly off his shoulder. They all count.
  22. Yep. Us armchair managers clearly know **** all!
  23. 3-0
  24. Claise has played well today. He's going to be very good for us.
×
×
  • Create New...