Suhari

No issues with Archer; I like him. For a lower league opponent presumably AArma and Fraser have enough about them. Neither are close to prem quality though.

At least it's not 5 at the back. JS to the bench - surprised. Bree over Taylor, and no KWP - hmmm. Fraser and AArma either side of Archer - doesn't scream 'potent' to me. Wood not Edwards (no ABK) - righto.

I don't believe RM would stick around if/when we go down. He'll be off to his next club like a shot. The risk of becoming another Stoke/WBA etc is massive. I can't believe the club can think 'yoyo' is a strategy. Surely noone is that stupid? Jesus. I really want RM replaced. And SR for that matter.

I wonder if Potter is in line the job.

That's what she said.

Amen.

Absolutely. Totally fucking dull. I'm sure some will suggest it was a tactical battle, played out within the amazing possession-heavy, modern and interesting style though. For me: we are just a lifeless, dull, overly-coached team; City were't at their best, didn't get out of second gear and were never really in danger.

And how we're making progress.

It promotes strength when in the box.

C'mon. Put TP on you plumsack.

Serious question. Can anyone see a solid reason or that sub? Is Manning injured? Does it give us any level of potential advantage/improvement?

James Bree coming on. That's inspirational.

Risks giving away possession.

Wow. How slow was Manning then?!

Surely it's Tall time?

Soeone needed to have a shot then. FFS.

Archer hits the bar!

Fair enough. But what's their xG and posession like?

AL looked a little irked just then.

Corriander. Corriander this approach and manager and we're cooked.

But what's their posession like?

This is so dull. City not out of second gear and not even breaking a sweat. Nor are we - but then we never do.

Is that JS stepping up into their half?

RM has just asked for a box of tissues.

'Good possession, but no intent to go anywhere near the City penalty area' says the commentator on my stream. Sums up our season pretty much.