Jump to content

Toadhall Saint

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    12,604
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

28,244 profile views

Toadhall Saint's Achievements

  1. I do not want to see us royally fucked I’m just pointing out that they are setting a precedent and that 300k would be a walk in the park to most champ teams given that it’s less than 10 weeks wages for one player. So I’m trying to gauge what would be proportionate is that ok with you?
  2. So given your mitigating comments (all not relevant to the rule btw) what’s your best guess if it needs to be proportionate but is also setting a precedent? 300k,400k,500k? Plus points deduction? im not holding my breath because as is always with you you just Mather on and not really have an opinion.
  3. So what’s your guess then Solomon?
  4. Even more reason to set a harsh one no? 300k is a slap in the wrist from Barry humphries.
  5. They are setting a precedent. That precedent needs to ensure that other EFL teams think twice before being caught observing within 72 hours.
  6. That’s not really a deterrent for other EFL teams tho.
  7. So what judgements mean we don’t play in the final on sat other than expulsion from the comp?
  8. Yes
  9. Makes sense but the 24 hours means the judgement will fed back on Weds.
  10. Good tick tock tick tock, the further this gets in the week the less likely for the game to be changed
  11. And I genuinely believe you shouldn’t read anything into it. Normal stuff on normal day from the media team.
  12. So the defence is “I’m thick sorry”? As that wouldn’t be so bad for our reputation? Seriously hope we have more than that.
  13. Yep but it would need to be documented - emails, voicemails, text messages etc.
  14. He works for Saints.
  15. Thing was he represented himself 😉
×
×
  • Create New...