Toadhall Saint

Looked as if he was standing by a tree. Given its 2d and the angle is straight on 😉

They are literally moaning about a process they instigated and knew they would not be party too. Any and all evidence needed in regard to the rule breaking needed to be provided to the EFL in good time (which has passed). Perhaps if they had got all the evidence together instead of trying to manipulated public opinion they may have stood a better chance - bit of an own goal there (and no amount of observation can help with those).

Made it to the BBC now https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cwy2dg2w168o

But like “stevie Gibson we bankrupted you”.

KC’s hold integrity in high regard it’s right up there with the truth and committing perjury

Thanks for the update and bon chance tonight!

Also having a squad that allows constant refreshing of players.

Must be why we lost to Man City eh? 😉

My question is why haven’t the other clubs reported it to the EFL? Surely that would be aware as you would think Boro would have spoken to them out of courtesy given they will be naming them in a disciplinary hearing that could have a baring on their league position should Saints be docked points for this season.

I’d like to know how the 72 hours was decided. Personally not sure if it’s morally wrong given that most clubs do it (according to a post earlier in the us thread) and we now can live in the cesspool that us modern day football where money is king

Yes and by doing so broke rule 3.4 also

Yep it’s not going to be a walkover. Mcburnie is the issue for me too - control him and a lot of their forward play is easily nullified

Oh bollox ☝️ didn’t think of that 🤣

That is a very good point. It makes the 72 hour bit even more stupid.

2nd game doesn’t count as it was way over 72 hours.