Jump to content

VectisSaint

Members
  • Posts

    13,461
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

VectisSaint's Achievements

  1. He wasn't offered a contract by Saints. We fucked up the option (because of Spygate). It wasn't an extension to a contract.
  2. Stewart's agents weren't the bad guys, the Club fucked up and demonstrated that their thoughts on Stewart were different if we got promoted, they showed no faith in him for the PL. Hope Will is better than Olly 😉
  3. Well I never. Exactly as I suggested with Ross. Of course we need another striker, anyone who thinks Cyle Larin (who I really like) would play 46 games needs to give their head a wobble. I'll be (pleasantly) surprised if he does 30. Made worse of course by not having a full preseason.
  4. Shea Charles back at Staplewood today.
  5. Not fringe players, finishers rather than starters. 😉
  6. much more like Edozie/Archer, and I wouldn't be worried about either or both of them being off.
  7. I suggest the important point is whether he has accepted. Don't believe for one moment that this would have happened if there was any mileage in the FA "investigation" of his being "bullied". More signs to me that nothing is going to happen and that the club already know where they stand with the FA. Hope I'm not proved wrong.
  8. Charles is not due back yet due to international duties in June (world cup warm-up friendlies). I thought the same would have applied to our 3 Irish internationals but note that none of them were involved in the Irish squad.
  9. I don't think that's how it works, but yes if a particular manager had brought the game into disrepute (LOL) or similar they could be charged. I don't know the Man City charges in detail but I've never heard of any of their managers being individually responsible for any of the alleged financial misdemeanours. As you alluded to though they would not bring any charges while the PL "investigations" continue, otherwise it could be seen to compromise the due process. As I've already said several times I am pretty sure that the FA are only really interested in the alleged "bullying", because it brings into disrepute their "inclusivity" goals. They may include other charges but thats the thing they "care" about, being seen to be a fully inclusive (woke) organisation.
  10. The charges by the EFL were against the Club (same as PL have charged Man City). The FA deal with individuals.
  11. Hydration breaks
  12. Played 31 of 46 EFL matches, started 27, from bench 4. Hamstring injury kept him out of the squad for 15. It's a complete myth that he was not a starter last season. Previous season started 42 for Wednesday.
  13. Our very own Hassan Kachloul giving his views on the Beeb.
  14. FA Disciplinary regulations on Misconduct would suggest otherwise. If you fancy going through the 115 page document to satisfy yourself that it's all made up as they go along be my guest.
  15. Bringing the game into disrepute, misconduct. As I've said before, the thing that the FA will be most interested in (not saying it's right but because they are woke) is the allegation of bullying.
×
×
  • Create New...